Literature DB >> 19632560

Assessing technological change in cardiothoracic surgery.

Alexander Iribarne1, Mark J Russo, Alan J Moskowitz, Deborah D Ascheim, Lawrence D Brown, Annetine C Gelijns.   

Abstract

Technological innovation--broadly defined as the development and introduction of new drugs, devices, and procedures--has played a major role in advancing the field of cardiothoracic surgery. It has generated new forms of care for patients and improved treatment options. Innovation, however, comes at a price. Total national health care expenditures now exceed $2 trillion per year in the United States and all current estimates indicate that this number will continue to rise. As we continue to seek the most innovative medical treatments for cardiovascular disease, the spiraling cost of these technologies comes to the forefront. In this article, we address 3 challenges in managing the health and economic impact of new and emerging technologies in cardiothoracic surgery: (1) challenges associated with the dynamics of technological growth itself; (2) challenges associated with methods of analysis; and (3) the ways in which value judgments and political factors shape the translation of evidence into policy. We conclude by discussing changes in the analytical, financial, and institutional realms that can improve evidence-based decision-making in cardiac surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19632560      PMCID: PMC2935793          DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1043-0679


  19 in total

1.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  E A Rose; A C Gelijns; A J Moskowitz; D F Heitjan; L W Stevenson; W Dembitsky; J W Long; D D Ascheim; A R Tierney; R G Levitan; J T Watson; P Meier; N S Ronan; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; L W Miller; L Gupta; O H Frazier; P Desvigne-Nickens; M C Oz; V L Poirier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty?

Authors:  Nick Freemantle; Melanie Calvert; John Wood; Joanne Eastaugh; Carl Griffin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.

Authors:  Sean R Tunis; Daniel B Stryer; Carolyn M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Cost-of-illness analyses for policy making: a cautionary tale of use and misuse.

Authors:  Eric Finkelstein; Phaedra Corso
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Problems with interval estimates of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Authors:  D F Heitjan; A J Moskowitz; W Whang
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  INvestigation of STEnt grafts in patients with type B Aortic Dissection: design of the INSTEAD trial--a prospective, multicenter, European randomized trial.

Authors:  Christoph A Nienaber; Simona Zannetti; Barbara Barbieri; Stephan Kische; Wolfgang Schareck; Tim C Rehders
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Tying clinical research to patient care by use of an observational database.

Authors:  M A Hlatky; K L Lee; F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; D B Mark; R A Rosati
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Elisabeth Ståhle; Ted E Feldman; Marcel van den Brand; Eric J Bass; Nic Van Dyck; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Keith D Aaronson; Himanshu Patel; Francis D Pagani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Left ventricular assist devices as permanent heart failure therapy: the price of progress.

Authors:  Mehmet C Oz; Annetine C Gelijns; Leslie Miller; Cuiling Wang; Patrice Nickens; Raymond Arons; Keith Aaronson; Wayne Richenbacher; Clifford van Meter; Karl Nelson; Alan Weinberg; John Watson; Eric A Rose; Alan J Moskowitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Integrating economic evaluation methods into clinical and translational science award consortium comparative effectiveness educational goals.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Rachel Easterwood; Mark J Russo; Y Claire Wang
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Rachel Easterwood; Mark J Russo; Y Claire Wang; Jonathan Yang; Kimberly N Hong; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Rachel Easterwood; Edward Y H Chan; Jonathan Yang; Lori Soni; Mark J Russo; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2011-05

4.  Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Mark J Russo; Rachel Easterwood; Kimberly N Hong; Jonathan Yang; Faisal H Cheema; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.102

Review 5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis in cardiac surgery: A review of its concepts and methodologies.

Authors:  Bart S Ferket; Jonathan M Oxman; Alexander Iribarne; Annetine C Gelijns; Alan J Moskowitz
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.209

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.