Literature DB >> 14530421

A clinical investigation of force delivery systems for orthodontic space closure.

C Nightingale1, S P Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the force retention, and rates of space closure achieved by elastomeric chain and nickel titanium coil springs.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Eastman Dental Hospital, London and Queen Mary's University Hospital, Roehampton, 1998-2000. SUBJECTS,
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two orthodontic patients, wearing the pre-adjusted edgewise appliance undergoing space closure in opposing quadrants, using sliding mechanics on 0.019 x 0.025-inch posted stainless steel archwires. Medium-spaced elastomeric chain [Durachain, OrthoCare (UK) Ltd., Bradford, UK] and 9-mm nickel titanium coil springs [OrthoCare (UK) Ltd.] were placed in opposing quadrants for 15 patients. Elastomeric chain only was used in a further seven patients. The initial forces on placement and residual forces at the subsequent visit were measured with a dial push-pull gauge [Orthocare (UK) Ltd]. Study models of eight patients were taken before and after space closure, from which measurements were made to establish mean space closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The forces were measured in grammes and space closure in millimetres.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine per cent (31/53) of the elastomeric sample maintained at least 50 per cent of the initial force over a time period of 1-15 weeks. No sample lost all its force, and the mean loss was 47 per cent (range: 0-76 per cent). Nickel titanium coil springs lost force rapidly over 6 weeks, following that force levels plateaued. Forty-six per cent (12/26) maintained at least 50 per cent of their initial force over a time period of 1-22 weeks, and mean force loss was 48 per cent (range: 12-68 per cent). The rate of mean weekly space closure for elastomeric chain was 0.21 mm and for nickel titanium coil springs 0.26 mm. There was no relationship between the initial force applied and rate of space closure. None of the sample failed during the study period giving a 100 per cent response rate.
CONCLUSIONS: In clinical use, the force retention of elastomeric chain was better than previously concluded. High initial forces resulted in high force decay. Nickel titanium coil springs and elastomeric chain closed spaces at a similar rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530421     DOI: 10.1093/ortho/30.3.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN: 1465-3125


  16 in total

1.  Effectiveness of vibrational forces on orthodontic treatment : A randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Baris Can Telatar; Ahmet Yalcın Gungor
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparing patient-centered outcomes and efficiency of space closure between nickel-titanium closed-coil springs and elastomeric power chains during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Serene A Badran; Juman M Al-Zaben; Lina M Al-Taie; Haya Tbeishi; Mahmoud K Al-Omiri
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.684

3.  In-vivo force decay of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs.

Authors:  Crystal Cox; Tung Nguyen; Lorne Koroluk; Ching-Chang Ko
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  A comparison of resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets under an increasing applied moment.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Open-coil retraction spring.

Authors:  Pavankumar Janardan Vibhute
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2011-09-29

6.  The effect of different environmental factors on force degradation of three common systems of orthodontic space closure.

Authors:  Morteza Oshagh; Farzaneh Khajeh; Somayeh Heidari; Sepideh Torkan; Hamid Reza Fattahi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Canine retraction: A systematic review of different methods used.

Authors:  Rohit S Kulshrestha; Ragni Tandon; Pratik Chandra
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Computerized Analysis of Digital Photographs for Evaluation of Tooth Movement.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Toodehzaeim; Maryam Karandish; Mohammad Nabi Karandish
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-03

9.  Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains.

Authors:  Haya A Barsoum; Hend S ElSayed; Fouad A El Sharaby; Juan Martin Palomo; Yehya A Mostafa
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Force-degradation pattern of six different orthodontic elastomeric chains.

Authors:  Ah Mirhashemi; A Saffarshahroudi; A Sodagar; M Atai
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.