Literature DB >> 14530229

Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care.

Jeffrey L Jackson1, Patrick G O'Malley, Kurt Kroenke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of acute knee pain often includes radiography of the knee.
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the literature to determine the role of radiologic procedures in evaluating common causes of acute knee pain: fractures, meniscal or ligamentous injuries, osteoarthritis, and pseudogout. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search from 1966 to October 2002. STUDY SELECTION: We included all published, peer-reviewed studies of decision rules for fractures. We included studies that used arthroscopy as the gold standard for measuring the accuracy of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for meniscal and ligamentous knee damage. We included all studies on the use of radiographs in pseudogout. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted all data in duplicate and abstracted physical examination and MRI results into 2 x 2 tables. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 5 decision rules for deciding when to use plain films in knee fractures, the Ottawa knee rules (injury due to trauma and age >55 years, tenderness at the head of the fibula or the patella, inability to bear weight for 4 steps, or inability to flex the knee to 90 degrees) have the strongest supporting evidence. When the history suggests a potential meniscal or ligamentous injury, the physical examination is moderately sensitive (meniscus, 87%; anterior cruciate ligament, 74%; and posterior cruciate ligament, 81%) and specific (meniscus, 92%; anterior cruciate ligament, 95%; and posterior cruciate ligament, 95%). The Lachman test is more sensitive and specific for ligamentous tears than is the drawer sign. For meniscal tears, joint line tenderness is sensitive (75%) but not specific (27%), while the McMurray test is specific (97%) but not sensitive (52%). Compared with the physical examination, MRI is more sensitive for ligamentous and meniscal damage but less specific. When the differential diagnosis for acute knee pain includes an exacerbation of osteoarthritis, clinical features (age >50 years, morning stiffness <30 minutes, crepitus, or bony enlargement) are 89% sensitive and 88% specific for underlying chronic arthritis. Adding plain films improves sensitivity slightly but not specificity. Plain films for pseudogout are not sensitive or specific, according to limited-quality studies.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the Ottawa knee rules to decide when to obtain plain films for suspected knee fracture. A careful physical examination should be sufficient to decide whether to refer patients with potential meniscal and ligament injuries, and we prefer clinical criteria rather than plain films for evaluating osteoarthritis. We do not recommend using plain films to diagnose pseudogout.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530229     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  39 in total

1.  Value of History, Physical Examination, and Radiographic Findings in the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Meniscal Tear Among Middle-Aged Subjects With Knee Pain.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Savannah R Smith; Heidi Y Yang; Scott D Martin; John Wright; Laurel A Donnell-Fink; Elena Losina
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Clinical classification criteria for knee osteoarthritis: performance in the general population and primary care.

Authors:  G Peat; E Thomas; R Duncan; L Wood; E Hay; P Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Acute monoarthritis: what is the cause of my patient's painful swollen joint?

Authors:  Lingling Ma; Ann Cranney; Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Comparison of image quality in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using 32-channel receiver coils.

Authors:  F Schoth; N Kraemer; T Niendorf; C Hohl; R W Gunther; G A Krombach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Capsule Commentary on Perlman et al., Efficacy and Safety of Massage for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Diagnostic validity and triage concordance of a physiotherapist compared to physicians' diagnoses for common knee disorders.

Authors:  S Décary; M Fallaha; B Pelletier; P Frémont; J Martel-Pelletier; J-P Pelletier; D E Feldman; M-P Sylvestre; P-A Vendittoli; F Desmeules
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Developing an Appropriateness Criteria for Knee MRI Using the Rand Appropriateness Method (RAM)-2013.

Authors:  Hossein Ebrahimipour; Seyedeh Zahra Mirfeizi; Ali Vafaee Najar; Amir Reza Kachooei; Amir Shahriar Ariamanesh; Reza Ganji; Habibollah Esmaeeli; Hedayat Salari; Marjan Vejdani
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 8.  Wearable knee health system employing novel physiological biomarkers.

Authors:  Omer T Inan; Daniel C Whittingslow; Caitlin N Teague; Sinan Hersek; Maziyar Baran Pouyan; Mindy Millard-Stafford; Geza F Kogler; Michael N Sawka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Leblanc; Marcin Kowalczuk; Nicole Andruszkiewicz; Nicole Simunovic; Forough Farrokhyar; Travis Lee Turnbull; Richard E Debski; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  [Value of the clinical examination in suspected meniscal injuries. A meta-analysis].

Authors:  B Ockert; F Haasters; H Polzer; S Grote; M A Kessler; W Mutschler; K-G Kanz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.