Literature DB >> 27390312

Value of History, Physical Examination, and Radiographic Findings in the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Meniscal Tear Among Middle-Aged Subjects With Knee Pain.

Jeffrey N Katz1, Savannah R Smith1, Heidi Y Yang1, Scott D Martin1, John Wright1, Laurel A Donnell-Fink1, Elena Losina2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of clinical history, radiographic findings, and physical examination findings in the diagnosis of symptomatic meniscal tear (SMT) in patients over age 45 years, in whom concomitant osteoarthritis is prevalent.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of patients from 2 orthopedic surgeons' clinics, we assessed clinical history, physical examination findings, and radiographic findings in patients age >45 years with knee pain. The orthopedic surgeons rated their confidence that subjects' symptoms were due to meniscal tear; we defined the diagnosis of SMT as at least 70% confidence. We used logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with diagnosis of SMT, and we used the regression results to construct an index of the likelihood of SMT.
RESULTS: In 174 participants, 6 findings were associated independently with the expert clinician having ≥70% confidence that symptoms were due to meniscal tear: localized pain, ability to fully bend the knee, pain duration <1 year, lack of varus alignment, lack of pes planus, and absence of joint space narrowing on radiographs. The index identified a low-risk group with 3% likelihood of SMT.
CONCLUSION: While clinicians traditionally rely upon mechanical symptoms in this diagnostic setting, our findings did not support the conclusion that mechanical symptoms were associated with the expert's confidence that symptoms were due to meniscal tear. An index that includes history of localized pain, full flexion, duration <1 year, pes planus, varus alignment, and joint space narrowing can be used to stratify patients according to their risk of SMT, and it identifies a subgroup with very low risk.
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27390312      PMCID: PMC5219865          DOI: 10.1002/acr.22975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  28 in total

1.  A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care. 1. Validity and reliability.

Authors:  C Jinks; M Lewis; B N Ong; P Croft
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Is arthroscopic surgery beneficial in treating non-traumatic, degenerative medial meniscal tears? A five year follow-up.

Authors:  Sylvia V Herrlin; Peter O Wange; Gunilla Lapidus; Maria Hållander; Suzanne Werner; Lars Weidenhielm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The diagnosis of meniscus injuries; some new clinical methods.

Authors:  A G APLEY
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1947-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care.

Authors:  G Peat; R McCarney; P Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II.

Authors:  Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-01

6.  Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear.

Authors:  Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Ari Itälä; Antti Joukainen; Heikki Nurmi; Juha Kalske; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A comparative study of meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment for degenerative horizontal tears of the medial meniscus.

Authors:  Ji-Hyeon Yim; Jong-Keun Seon; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jun-Ik Choi; Min-Cheol Kim; Keun-Bae Lee; Hyoung-Yeon Seo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Patients with suspected meniscal tears: prevalence of abnormalities seen on MRI of 100 symptomatic and 100 contralateral asymptomatic knees.

Authors:  Marco Zanetti; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Marius R Schmid; José Romero; Burkhardt Seifert; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Patrick G O'Malley; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Impact of type of meniscal tear on radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a sixteen-year followup of meniscectomy with matched controls.

Authors:  M Englund; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Arthroscopic meniscal surgery: a national society treatment guideline and consensus statement.

Authors:  S G F Abram; D J Beard; A J Price
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Adverse outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a study of 700 000 procedures in the national Hospital Episode Statistics database for England.

Authors:  Simon G F Abram; Andrew Judge; David J Beard; Andrew J Price
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Meniscal Lesions in Geriatric Population: Prevalence and Association with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Meltem Özdemir; Rasime Kavak
Journal:  Curr Aging Sci       Date:  2019
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.