Literature DB >> 14528957

Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrast-enhanced MR-mammography.

T W Vomweg1, M Buscema, H U Kauczor, A Teifke, M Intraligi, S Terzi, C P Heussel, T Achenbach, O Rieker, D Mayer, M Thelen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the capability of improved artificial neural networks (ANN) and additional novel training methods in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-mammography (MRM). A total of 604 histologically proven cases of contrast-enhanced lesions of the female breast at MRI were analyzed. Morphological, dynamic and clinical parameters were collected and stored in a database. The data set was divided into several groups using random or experimental methods [Training & Testing (T&T) algorithm] to train and test different ANNs. An additional novel computer program for input variable selection was applied. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared with a statistical method and an expert radiologist. After optimization of the distribution of cases among the training and testing sets by the T & T algorithm and the reduction of input variables by the Input Selection procedure a highly sophisticated ANN achieved a sensitivity of 93.6% and a specificity of 91.9% in predicting malignancy of lesions within an independent prediction sample set. The best statistical method reached a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 68.9%. An expert radiologist performed better than the statistical method but worse than the ANN (sensitivity 92.1%, specificity 85.6%). Features extracted out of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRM and additional clinical data can be successfully analyzed by advanced ANNs. The quality of the resulting network strongly depends on the training methods, which are improved by the use of novel training tools. The best results of an improved ANN outperform expert radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14528957     DOI: 10.1118/1.1600871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise.

Authors:  Toni W Vomweg; Andrea Teifke; R Peter Kunz; Christian Hintze; Alexander Hlawatsch; Annett Kern; Karl F Kreitner; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Artificial neural networks and artificial organisms can predict Alzheimer pathology in individual patients only on the basis of cognitive and functional status.

Authors:  Massimo Buscema; Enzo Grossi; David Snowdon; Piero Antuono; Marco Intraligi; Guido Maurelli; Rita Savarè
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2004

3.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions?

Authors:  Gerda Leinsinger; Thomas Schlossbauer; Michael Scherr; Oliver Lange; Maximilian Reiser; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Classification of small contrast enhancing breast lesions in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of morphological criteria and dynamic analysis based on unsupervised vector-quantization.

Authors:  Thomas Schlossbauer; Gerda Leinsinger; Axel Wismuller; Oliver Lange; Michael Scherr; Anke Meyer-Baese; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  A vector machine formulation with application to the computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer from DCE-MRI screening examinations.

Authors:  Jacob E D Levman; Ellen Warner; Petrina Causer; Anne L Martel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines.

Authors:  J Levman; T Leung; P Causer; D Plewes; A L Martel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Megan Rakoczy; Donald McGaughey; Michael J Korenberg; Jacob Levman; Anne L Martel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  A new endoscopic ultrasonography image processing method to evaluate the prognosis for pancreatic cancer treated with interstitial brachytherapy.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Yan Liu; Zheng Lu; Zhen-Dong Jin; Yu-Hong Hu; Jian-Guo Yu; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection?

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Franca Podo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  MR spectroscopy of the breast.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; A Fausto; F Podo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.