Literature DB >> 14528902

Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: evidence for early compensation.

Holger Mitterer1, Leo Blomert.   

Abstract

The pronunciation of the same word may vary considerably as a consequence of its context. The Dutch word tuin (English, garden) may be pronounced tuim if followed by bank (English, bench), but not if followed by stoel (English, chair). In a series of four experiments, we examined how Dutch listeners cope with this context sensitivity in their native language. A first word identification experiment showed that the perception of a word-final nasal depends on the subsequent context. Viable assimilations, but not unviable assimilations, were often confused perceptually with canonical word forms in a word identification task. Two control experiments ruled out the possibility that this effect was caused by perceptual masking or was influenced by lexical top-down effects. A passive-listening study in which electrophysiological measurements were used showed that only unviable, but not viable, phonological changes elicited a significant mismatch negativity. The results indicate that phonological assimilations are dealt with by an early prelexical mechanism.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14528902     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  12 in total

1.  Atypical neural responses to phonological detail in children with developmental language impairments.

Authors:  Lisa M D Archibald; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.464

2.  The Role of Orthography in Lexical Processing of the Phonological Variants in Second Language.

Authors:  Jeong-Im Han; Joo-Yeon Kim; Tae-Hwan Choi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-04

3.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Putting underspecification in context: ERP evidence for sparse representations in morphophonological alternations.

Authors:  Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Phonological Variations Are Compensated at the Lexical Level: Evidence From Auditory Neural Activity.

Authors:  Hatice Zora; Tomas Riad; Sari Ylinen; Valéria Csépe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The role of native-language knowledge in the perception of casual speech in a second language.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; Annelie Tuinman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-13

8.  Not every pseudoword disrupts word recognition: an ERP study.

Authors:  Claudia K Friedrich; Carsten Eulitz; Aditi Lahiri
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Effects of place of articulation changes on auditory neural activity: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Kambiz Tavabi; Ludger Elling; Christian Dobel; Christo Pantev; Pienie Zwitserlood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Processing Nasals with and without Consecutive Context Phonemes: Evidence from Explicit Categorization and the N100.

Authors:  Heidrun Bien; Pienie Zwitserlood
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.