Literature DB >> 14528773

The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.

Diana Ram1, Benjamin Peretz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the behavior reaction of children who received local anesthesia with a conventional syringe injection and a computerized device (Wand).
METHODS: One hundred and two children ages 3 to 10 years were selected for this study. In 1 group there were 55 children between the ages of 3 to 5 years old, and in the other group there were 47 children ages 6 to 10 years old. They all needed at least 2 clinical sessions of operative procedures, preceded by a local anesthetic injection, 1 on either side of the same jaw. The local anesthesia was delivered using either the Wand or the traditional syringe. A random crossover design was used so that each child served as his/her own control.
RESULTS: There were 25 girls and 30 boys in group A (mean 4.1 +/- 0.6 years), and 26 boys and 21 girls in group B (mean 7.2 +/- 1.3 years). Most of the children had a good reaction to both techniques of local anesthesia. No significant difference in either group was found between boys and girls. The children's reactions to injection in the mandible or the maxilla with the Wand or the conventional technique, regarding crying, facial expression, hands, legs and torso movements were similar with no statistically significant difference. There was no statistical difference when the maxillary infiltration was delivered to 1 or multiple teeth. No significant difference was found when the Wand was delivered during the first or second visit.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested there was no difference in the pain behavior of children during the administration of local anesthesia with a conventional injection or a computerized device when the operator was an experienced pediatric dentist. This was true for maxillary infiltration and mandibular block. For other techniques, such as palatal injection and periodontal ligament injection, more studies should be conducted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14528773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Child (Chic)        ISSN: 1551-8949


  18 in total

1.  The effects of a 2-stage injection technique on inferior alveolar nerve block injection pain.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Geoffrey Steinkruger; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

2.  Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Pain Using a Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Device (CCLAD): A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Chase Crowley; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

3.  Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Campanella; Antonio Libonati; Roberto Nardi; Vincenzo Angotti; Gianni Gallusi; Edoardo Montemurro; Maurizio D'Amario; Giuseppe Marzo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections.

Authors:  Eliezer Kaufman; Joel B Epstein; Eitan Naveh; Meir Gorsky; Anat Gross; Galit Cohen
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

5.  Pain control in local analgesia.

Authors:  J G Meechan
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-06

6.  A comparison of pain and anxiety associated with the administration of maxillary local analgesia with Wand and conventional technique.

Authors:  J F Tahmassebi; M Nikolaou; M S Duggal
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-06

7.  A clinical comparison of pain perception and extent of area anesthetized by Wand(®) and a traditional syringe.

Authors:  Meet Shah; Sumanth Shivaswamy; Sanjay Jain; Sonal Tambwekar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-04

8.  Pain and efficacy rating of a microprocessor-controlled metered injection system for local anaesthesia in minor hand surgery.

Authors:  André S Nimigan; Bing Siang Gan
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-25

9.  Supplemental pulpal anesthesia for mandibular teeth.

Authors:  Thangavel Boopathi; Mathew Sebeena; Kailasam Sivakumar; Jayakodi Harikaran; Kumaravadivel Karthick; Aruna Raj
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2013-06

10.  Cartridge syringe vs computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system: Pain related behaviour over two sequential visits - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yogesh-Kumar Thoppe-Dhamodhara; Sharath Asokan; Baby-John John; GeethaPriya Pollachi-Ramakrishnan; Punithavathy Ramachandran; Praburajan Vilvanathan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.