Literature DB >> 14527941

Effects of electroporation on optically recorded transmembrane potential responses to high-intensity electrical shocks.

V P Nikolski1, A T Sambelashvili, V I Krinsky, I R Efimov.   

Abstract

The outcome of defibrillation shocks is determined by the nonlinear transmembrane potential (DeltaVm) response induced by a strong external electrical field in cardiac cells. We investigated the contribution of electroporation to DeltaVm transients during high-intensity shocks using optical mapping. Rectangular and ramp stimuli (10-20 ms) of different polarities and intensities were applied to the rabbit heart epicardium during the plateau phase of the action potential (AP). DeltaVm were optically recorded under a custom 6-mm-diameter electrode using a voltage-sensitive dye. A gradual increase of cathodal and well as anodal stimulus strength was associated with 1) saturation and subsequent reduction of DeltaVm; 2) postshock diastolic resting potential (RP) elevation; and 3) postshock AP amplitude (APA) reduction. Weak stimuli induced a monotonic DeltaVm response and did not affect the RP level. Strong shocks produced a nonmonotonic DeltaVm response and caused RP elevation and a reduction of postshock APA. The maximum positive and maximum negative DeltaVm were recorded at 170 +/- 20 mA/cm2 for cathodal stimuli and at 240 +/- 30 mA/cm2 for anodal stimuli, respectively (means +/- SE, n = 8, P = 0.003). RP elevation reached 10% of APA at a stimulus strength of 320 +/- 40 mA/cm2 for both polarities. Strong ramp stimuli (20 ms, 600 mA/cm2) induced a nonmonotonic DeltaVm response, reaching the same largest positive and negative values as for rectangular shocks. The transition from monotonic to nonmonotonic morphology correlates with RP elevation and APA reduction, which is consistent with cell membrane electroporation. Strong shocks resulted in propidium iodide uptake, suggesting sarcolemma electroporation. In conclusion, electroporation is a likely explanation of the saturation and nonmonotonic nature of cellular responses reported for strong electric stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14527941     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00689.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  13 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of defibrillation.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Vladimir G Fast; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Yves T Wang; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Geran Kostecki; Matt Hemphill; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  High-energy defibrillation increases the dispersion of regional ventricular repolarization.

Authors:  Yang Pang; Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Shujing Ren; Tianyou Ling; Ying Chen; Gang Gu; Yongchu Shen; Liqun Wu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Excitation of murine cardiac myocytes by nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Jan E Azarov; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-17

7.  Cardiac myocyte excitation by ultrashort high-field pulses.

Authors:  Sufen Wang; Jiexiao Chen; Meng-Tse Chen; P Thomas Vernier; Martin A Gundersen; Miguel Valderrábano
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Transient local injury current in right ventricular electrogram after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock predicts heart failure progression.

Authors:  Larisa G Tereshchenko; Mitchell N Faddis; Barry J Fetics; Karl E Zelik; Igor R Efimov; Ronald D Berger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Termination of atrial fibrillation using pulsed low-energy far-field stimulation.

Authors:  Flavio H Fenton; Stefan Luther; Elizabeth M Cherry; Niels F Otani; Valentin Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Eberhard Bodenschatz; Robert F Gilmour
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  High defibrillation threshold: the science, signs and solutions.

Authors:  Sony Jacob; Victorio Pidlaoan; Jaspreet Singh; Aditya Bharadwaj; Mehul B Patel; Antonio Carrillo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.