Literature DB >> 20512489

Sustainable use of biotechnology for bioenergy feedstocks.

Hong S Moon1, Jason M Abercrombie, Albert P Kausch, C Neal Stewart.   

Abstract

Done correctly, cellulosic bioenergy should be both environmentally and economically beneficial. Carbon sequestration and decreased fossil fuel use are both worthy goals in developing next-generation biofuels. We believe that biotechnology will be needed to significantly improve yield and digestibility of dedicated perennial herbaceous biomass feedstocks, such as switchgrass and Miscanthus, which are native to the US and China, respectively. This Forum discusses the sustainability of herbaceous feedstocks relative to the regulation of biotechnology with regards to likely genetically engineered traits. The Forum focuses on two prominent countries wishing to develop their bioeconomies: the US and China. These two countries also share a political desire and regulatory frameworks to enable the commercialization and wide release of transgenic feedstocks with appropriate and safe new genetics. In recent years, regulators in both countries perform regular inspections of transgenic field releases and seriously consider compliance issues, even though the US framework is considered to be more mature and stringent. Transgene flow continues to be a pertinent environmental and regulatory issue with regards to transgenic plants. This concern is largely driven by consumer issues and ecological uncertainties. Regulators are concerned about large-scale releases of transgenic crops that have sexually compatible crops or wild relatives that can stably harbor transgenes via hybridization and introgression. Therefore, prior to the commercialization or extensive field testing of transgenic bioenergy feedstocks, we recommend that mechanisms that ensure biocontainment of transgenes be instituted, especially for perennial grasses. A cautionary case study will be presented in which a plant's biology and ecology conspired against regulatory constraints in a non-biomass crop perennial grass (creeping bentgrass, Agrostis stolonifera), in which biocontainment was not attained. Appropriate technologies that could be applied to perennial grass feedstocks for biocontainment are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20512489     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9503-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  32 in total

Review 1.  Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops.

Authors:  Henry Daniell
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Plastid transformation in higher plants.

Authors:  Pal Maliga
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 3.  Genetically engineered cytoplasmic male sterility.

Authors:  Christine D Chase
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 4.  Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future.

Authors:  Joshua S Yuan; Kelly H Tiller; Hani Al-Ahmad; Nathan R Stewart; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Keeping the genie in the bottle: transgene biocontainment by excision in pollen.

Authors:  Hong S Moon; Yi Li; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Removal of antibiotic resistance genes from transgenic tobacco plastids.

Authors:  S Iamtham; A Day
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Advancing environmental risk assessment for transgenic biofeedstock crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz.

Authors:  S I Warwick; M-J Simard; A Légère; H J Beckie; L Braun; B Zhu; P Mason; G Séguin-Swartz; C N Stewart
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 9.  From dwarves to giants? Plant height manipulation for biomass yield.

Authors:  Maria G Salas Fernandez; Philip W Becraft; Yanhai Yin; Thomas Lübberstedt
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 18.313

10.  The anther-specific protein encoded by the Brassica napus and Arabidopsis thaliana A6 gene displays similarity to beta-1,3-glucanases.

Authors:  D L Hird; D Worrall; R Hodge; S Smartt; W Paul; R Scott
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.417

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bioenergy sustainability in China: potential and impacts.

Authors:  Jie Zhuang; Randall W Gentry; Gui-Rui Yu; Gary S Sayler; John W Bickham
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Transgene autoexcision in switchgrass pollen mediated by the Bxb1 recombinase.

Authors:  Maria N Somleva; Chang Ai Xu; Kieran P Ryan; Roger Thilmony; Oliver Peoples; Kristi D Snell; James Thomson
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.563

3.  Combining loss of function of FOLYLPOLYGLUTAMATE SYNTHETASE1 and CAFFEOYL-COA 3-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE1 for lignin reduction and improved saccharification efficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Hongli Xie; Nancy L Engle; Sivasankari Venketachalam; Chang Geun Yoo; Jaime Barros; Mitch Lecoultre; Nikki Howard; Guifen Li; Liang Sun; Avinash C Srivastava; Sivakumar Pattathil; Yunqiao Pu; Michael G Hahn; Arthur J Ragauskas; Richard S Nelson; Richard A Dixon; Timothy J Tschaplinski; Elison B Blancaflor; Yuhong Tang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Expression of fungal cutinase and swollenin in tobacco chloroplasts reveals novel enzyme functions and/or substrates.

Authors:  Dheeraj Verma; Shuangxia Jin; Anderson Kanagaraj; Nameirakpam D Singh; Jaiyanth Daniel; Pappachan E Kolattukudy; Michael Miller; Henry Daniell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.