Literature DB >> 14526195

Comparison of motion restriction and trunk stiffness provided by three thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSOs).

Jacek Cholewicki1, Kashif Alvi, Sheri P Silfies, Juan Bartolomei.   

Abstract

The amounts of thoracic and lumbar spine motion restriction and passive trunk stiffness provided by three thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSOs) (Aspen TLSO, Boston Body Jacket, and CAMP TLSO) were compared. Ten subjects executed maximum trunk flexion, extension, and lateral bending motions. The spine motion was measured noninvasively with a thin strain gauge device (Flexducer), and passive trunk stiffness around the neutral posture was estimated from an electromyography-assisted biomechanical model. No significant differences in either the restriction of motion or the amount of added passive trunk stiffness were found between the three orthoses. The subjects also did not perceive any difference in the restriction of motion but rated the Aspen TLSO significantly more comfortable than the other two orthoses. The rigid custom orthosis design may not be important for restricting the spine motion and providing passive trunk stiffness, or there may be other measures that reflect better the function of orthoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14526195     DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200310000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  6 in total

1.  Bracing of the trunk and neck has a differential effect on head control during gait.

Authors:  S Morrison; D M Russell; K Kelleran; M L Walker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Spyridon Zacharatos; Georgios Koureas; Panagiotis Megas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The value of a pantaloon cast test in surgical decision making for chronic low back pain patients: a systematic review of the literature supplemented with a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul C Willems; Leon Elmans; Patricia G Anderson; Wilco C H Jacobs; Dick B van der Schaaf; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of trunk stiffness provided by different design characteristics of lumbosacral orthoses.

Authors:  Jacek Cholewicki; Angela S Lee; N Peter Reeves; David C Morrisette
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  The effects of a three-week use of lumbosacral orthoses on trunk muscle activity and on the muscular response to trunk perturbations.

Authors:  Jacek Cholewicki; Kevin C McGill; Krupal R Shah; Angela S Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Changes in Lumbo-Pelvic Coordination of Individuals With and Without Low Back Pain When Wearing a Hip Orthosis.

Authors:  Matthew T Ballard; Colin Drury; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.