Literature DB >> 16705433

The value of a pantaloon cast test in surgical decision making for chronic low back pain patients: a systematic review of the literature supplemented with a prospective cohort study.

Paul C Willems1, Leon Elmans, Patricia G Anderson, Wilco C H Jacobs, Dick B van der Schaaf, Marinus de Kleuver.   

Abstract

The results of lumbar fusion in chronic low back pain (LBP) patients vary considerably, and there is a need for proper patient selection. Lumbosacral orthoses have been widely used to predict outcome, however, with little scientific support. The aim of the present study was to determine the value of a pantaloon cast test in selecting chronic LBP patients for lumbar fusion or conservative management. First, a systematic review of the literature was carried out in which two independent reviewers identified studies in Medline, Cochrane and Current Contents databases. Three papers met the selection criteria. In the only study with a control group, a significantly better outcome after fusion compared to conservative treatment was found in patients who reported significant pain relief while in a cast (i.e. a positive cast test). The results of lumbar fusion, however, were not significantly different for patients with a positive and those with a negative cast test. In addition to the review, a clinical cohort study of 257 LBP patients, who had been allocated to either lumbar fusion or conservative management by a temporary external transpedicular fixation trial, was performed. Prior to allocation, all had undergone a pantaloon cast test. Patients with no history of prior spine surgery and with a positive pantaloon cast test had a better outcome after lumbar fusion than those treated conservatively (P = 0.002, chi (2 )test). In patients with previous spine operations the outcomes were poor and the test was of no value. From the literature and the present patient cohort, it was concluded that only in chronic LBP patients without prior spine surgery, a pantaloon cast test with substantial pain relief suggests a favorable outcome of lumbar fusion compared to conservative management. The test has no value in patients who have had previous spine surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16705433     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0121-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  37 in total

1.  Is there a connection between the clinical response after an external fixation test or a subsequent lumbar fusion and the pre-test intervertebral kinematics?

Authors:  Teija Lund; Thomas R Oxland; Thomas Nydegger; Dietrich Schlenzka; Timo Laine; Paul Heini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Fusion of the lumbar spine. A consideration of the indications.

Authors:  Martin Krismer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-08

Review 3.  Spinal fusion for back pain: a clinical and radiological review.

Authors:  J O'Beirne; D O'Neill; J Gallagher; D H Williams
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-03

4.  Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. I. Restriction of gross body motions.

Authors:  S A Lantz; A B Schultz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The external fixation test of the lumbar spine. 30 complications in 25 of 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J R Soini; S K Seitsalo
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-04

6.  Evaluation of clinical lumbar instability using the treadmill.

Authors:  Y Tokuhashi; H Matsuzaki; S Sano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lateral mass fusion. A prospective study of a consecutive series with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  R K Jackson; D A Boston; A J Edge
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The treatment of lumbar spinal pain syndromes diagnosed by discography. Lumbar arthrodesis.

Authors:  F T Wetzel; S H LaRocca; G L Lowery; C N Aprill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The use of lumbosacral corsets prescribed for low back pain.

Authors:  S A Ahlgren; T Hansen
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Lumbar orthosis with unilateral hip immobilization. Effect on intervertebral mobility determined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  P Axelsson; R Johnsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons.

Authors:  Paul Willems; Rob de Bie; Cumhur Oner; René Castelein; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Safety and Efficacy of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Chronic Low Back Pain in a Short-stay Setting: Data From a Prospective Registry.

Authors:  Moira Vieli; Victor E Staartjes; Hubert A J Eversdjik; Marlies P De Wispelaere; Jan Wolter A Oosterhuis; Marc L Schröder
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-08-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.