Literature DB >> 16953447

Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace.

Panagiotis Korovessis1, Spyridon Zacharatos, Georgios Koureas, Panagiotis Megas.   

Abstract

Bracing is the most effective non-operative treatment for mild progressive spinal deformities in adolescence but it has shown a considerable impact on several aspects of adolescents' functioning. This cross-sectional study investigated the self-perceived health status of adolescents with the two most common deformities, treated with body orthosis. Seventy-nine adolescents with spinal deformities (idiopathic adolescent scoliosis, thoracic Scheuermann kyphosis) and 62 adolescents without spinal deformities were asked to complete the Quality of Life profile for Spine Deformities Instrument. This study showed that adolescents with deformities are significantly less likely to have back pain in training than controls, but more likely to have difficulty in forward bending, and in the most common daily activities while in brace. These individuals claim they wake up because of back pain and feel quite nervous with the external appearance of their body. These patients face often problems with their relations with friends, while they reported difficulties in getting up from bed and sleep at night more often than their counterparts without deformities. As they grow older, patients feel increasing ashamed of their body, as they are more concerned about the future effect of the deformity on their body. As the bracing time increases, patients have much more probability than controls to get low back pain. Girls with deformity have a higher probability than boys to get low back pain while working in the house and while training. Individuals with larger spinal curvatures have more difficulties in bending and increased incidence of back pain than their counterparts with smaller curvatures. Psychological reasons associated mainly with relations at school and back pain are the main causes for low compliance in adolescents with spinal deformities treated with body orthosis. Careful instructions for all individuals who will undergo brace therapy, psychological support for all patients who develop psychological reactions and physical training particularly for older girls should be recommended to increase bracing compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16953447      PMCID: PMC2229828          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0214-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  38 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Psychologic management of brace therapy for patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Kyoji Hayashi; Tetsuro Naruo; Shin-ichi Nozoe; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Perceptions of body image, happiness and satisfaction in adolescents wearing a Boston brace for scoliosis treatment.

Authors:  D S Sapountzi-Krepia; J Valavanis; G P Panteleakis; D T Zangana; P C Vlachojiannis; G S Sapkas
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Effects of thoracolumbosacral orthosis on spinal deformities, trunk asymmetry, and frontal lower rib cage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  P Korovessis; C Kyrkos; G Piperos; P N Soucacos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Social validity of support group and behavior therapy interventions for families of adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  T Wysocki; M A Harris; P Greco; L M Harvey; K McDonell; C L Danda; J Bubb; N H White
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1997-10

6.  Effectiveness of bracing in male patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  L A Karol
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The objective determination of compliance in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with spinal orthoses.

Authors:  Andreas Helfenstein; Michael Lankes; Katharina Ohlert; Deike Varoga; Hans-Jürgen Hahne; Hans Wolfram Ulrich; Joachim Hassenpflug
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of Adolescents with Spine Deformities.

Authors:  J M Climent; J Sánchez
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Backpacks, back pain, sagittal spinal curves and trunk alignment in adolescents: a logistic and multinomial logistic analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Georgios Koureas; Spyridon Zacharatos; Zisis Papazisis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis managed by a nighttime bending brace.

Authors:  J R Bowen; K A Keeler; S Pelegie
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Objective compliance of adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis in a dynamic SpineCor brace.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler; Stephanie Wietlisbach; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  No effect of osteopathic treatment on trunk morphology and spine flexibility in young women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol Hasler; Caius Schmid; Andreas Enggist; Conny Neuhaus; Thomas Erb
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Prospective evaluation of physical activity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis or kyphosis receiving brace treatment.

Authors:  Carsten Müller; Katharina Fuchs; Corinna Winter; Dieter Rosenbaum; Carolin Schmidt; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Disease-Specific Outcome Measures Evaluating the Health-Related Quality of Life of Children and Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis and Scheuermann's Kyphosis: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Taher Babaee; Vahideh Moradi; Ardalan Shariat; Albert T Anastasio; Alireza Khani; Mahtab Bagheri; Naeimeh Rouhani
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-10

6.  Spanish validation of Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire (BSSQ (brace).es) for adolescents with braces.

Authors:  Elisabetta D'Agata; Carles Pérez Testor; Manuel Rigo
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-07-15

7.  German validation of the quality of life profile for spinal disorders (QLPSD).

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Meinald T Thielsch; Georg Gosheger; Patrick Boertz; Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) and Scheuermann Kyphosis: the issue of overtreatment in Greece.

Authors:  Nikos S Karavidas
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-10-14

9.  Brace treatment for patients with Scheuermann's disease - a review of the literature and first experiences with a new brace design.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Deborah Turnbull; Silvia Bohr
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-09-29

Review 10.  Management of Spinal Deformities and Evidence of Treatment Effectiveness.

Authors:  Josette Bettany-Saltikov; Deborah Turnbull; Shu Yan Ng; Richard Webb
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.