Literature DB >> 14523257

Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.

Carol M Myford1, Edward W Wolfe.   

Abstract

The purpose of this two-part paper is to introduce researchers to the many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) approach for detecting and measuring rater effects. The researcher will learn how to use the Facets (Linacre, 2001) computer program to study five effects: leniency/severity, central tendency, randomness, halo, and differential leniency/severity. Part 1 of the paper provides critical background and context for studying MFRM. We present a catalog of rater effects, introducing effects that researchers have studied over the last three-quarters of a century in order to help readers gain a historical perspective on how those effects have been conceptualized. We define each effect and describe various ways the effect has been portrayed in the research literature. We then explain how researchers theorize that the effect impacts the quality of ratings, pinpoint various indices they have used to measure it, and describe various strategies that have been proposed to try to minimize its impact on the measurement of ratees. The second half of Part 1 provides conceptual and mathematical explanations of many-facet Rasch measurement, focusing on how researchers can use MFRM to study rater effects. First, we present the many-facet version of Andrich's (1978) rating scale model and identify questions about a rating operation that researchers can address using this model. We then introduce three hybrid MFRM models, explain the conceptual distinctions among them, describe how they differ from the rating scale model, and identify questions about a rating operation that researchers can address using these hybrid models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14523257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  25 in total

1.  Examining the Impacts of Rater Effects in Performance Assessments.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-08-05

2.  Essay Selection Methods for Adaptive Rater Monitoring.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Tian Song; Zhuoran Wang; Edward Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-25

3.  Evaluating Rater Accuracy in Rater-Mediated Assessments Using an Unfolding Model.

Authors:  Jue Wang; George Engelhard; Edward W Wolfe
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Exploring the Combined Effects of Rater Misfit and Differential Rater Functioning in Performance Assessments.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind; Wenjing Guo
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy.

Authors:  Charles Glisson; Sonja K Schoenwald; Anthony Hemmelgarn; Philip Green; Denzel Dukes; Kevin S Armstrong; Jason E Chapman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2010-08

6.  A mixture Rasch facets model for rater's illusory halo effects.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Jin; Ming Ming Chiu
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-01-11

7.  Examining the Performance of the Trifactor Model for Multiple Raters.

Authors:  James Soland; Megan Kuhfeld
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-12-07

8.  Detecting Differential Rater Functioning in Severity and Centrality: The Dual DRF Facets Model.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Jin; Thomas Eckes
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.088

9.  Detecting Rater Biases in Sparse Rater-Mediated Assessment Networks.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind; Yuan Ge
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.088

10.  Comparison of youth, caregiver, therapist, trained, and treatment expert raters of therapist adherence to a substance abuse treatment protocol.

Authors:  Jason E Chapman; Michael R McCart; Elizabeth J Letourneau; Ashli J Sheidow
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.