Literature DB >> 14523091

Dynamic coding of taste stimuli in the brainstem: effects of brief pulses of taste stimuli on subsequent taste responses.

Patricia M Di Lorenzo1, Christian H Lemon, Christian G Reich.   

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that the response profiles of taste-responsive cells in the brainstem may be modulated by inhibitory interactions, potentially originating from activity in peripheral taste nerves. This idea was explored by testing the hypothesis that brief (100 msec) pulses of taste stimuli would alter the responses to subsequently presented tastants in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) of urethane-anesthetized rats. Pulses of taste stimuli, called prepulses, were followed by a 3 sec presentation of the same or different taste stimulus. The prepulse-stimulus interval was either 1 or 5 sec, during which the tongue was rinsed with distilled water. Taste stimuli consisted of 0.1 m NaCl, 0.5 m sucrose, 0.01 m quinine HCl, and 0.01 m HCl. Taste prepulses suppressed (or enhanced) subsequent taste responses in 30 of 49 (61%) units when the prepulse-stimulus interval was 1 sec but were ineffective when this interval was 5 sec. Most commonly, NaCl or HCl prepulses attenuated the response to quinine. Control experiments showed that these effects were not attributable to adaptation, mixture effects, or response variability. In 19 (39%) of the units tested, effects of prepulses were large enough to change the order of effectiveness of the taste stimuli. Taste responses in these cells were "dynamically tuned" in that the magnitude of response was a function of the taste stimulus that immediately preceded it. Dynamic tuning may be the result of inhibitory interactions within the NTS; cells that show dynamic tuning may have a unique function in taste coding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14523091      PMCID: PMC6740402     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  17 in total

1.  Taste-specific cell assemblies in a biologically informed model of the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  Andrew M Rosen; Heike Sichtig; J David Schaffer; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Odor-taste convergence in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the awake freely licking rat.

Authors:  Olga D Escanilla; Jonathan D Victor; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Temperature systematically modifies neural activity for sweet taste.

Authors:  David M Wilson; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Enhancing GABAergic Tone in the Rostral Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Reconfigures Sensorimotor Neural Activity.

Authors:  Joshua D Sammons; Caroline E Bass; Jonathan D Victor; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural coding of taste by simultaneously recorded cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat.

Authors:  Andrew M Rosen; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Lateral hypothalamus contains two types of palatability-related taste responses with distinct dynamics.

Authors:  Jennifer X Li; Takashi Yoshida; Kevin J Monk; Donald B Katz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Comparison of somatostatin and corticotrophin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in forebrain neurons projecting to taste-responsive and non-responsive regions of the parabrachial nucleus in rat.

Authors:  Siva Panguluri; Shalini Saggu; Robert Lundy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Variability in responses and temporal coding of tastants of similar quality in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat.

Authors:  Andre T Roussin; Jonathan D Victor; Jen-Yung Chen; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Two types of inhibitory influences target different groups of taste-responsive cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat.

Authors:  Andrew M Rosen; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Information processing in the parabrachial nucleus of the pons.

Authors:  Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Daniel Platt; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.