Literature DB >> 17913985

Variability in responses and temporal coding of tastants of similar quality in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat.

Andre T Roussin1, Jonathan D Victor, Jen-Yung Chen, Patricia M Di Lorenzo.   

Abstract

In the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), electrophysiological responses to taste stimuli representing four basic taste qualities (sweet, sour, salty, or bitter) can often be discriminated by spike count, although in units for which the number of spikes is variable across identical stimulus presentations, spike timing (i.e., temporal coding) can also support reliable discrimination. The present study examined the contribution of spike count and spike timing to the discrimination of stimuli that evoke the same taste quality but are of different chemical composition. Responses to between 3 and 21 repeated presentations of two pairs of quality-matched tastants were recorded from 38 single cells in the NTS of urethane-anesthetized rats. Temporal coding was assessed in 24 cells, most of which were tested with salty and sour tastants, using an information-theoretic approach. Within a given cell, responses to tastants of similar quality were generally closer in magnitude than responses to dissimilar tastants; however, tastants of similar quality often reversed their order of effectiveness across replicate sets of trials. Typically, discrimination between tastants of dissimilar qualities could be made by spike count. Responses to tastants of similar quality typically evoked more similar response magnitudes but were more frequently, and to a proportionally greater degree, distinguishable based on temporal information. Results showed that nearly every taste-responsive NTS cell has the capacity to generate temporal features in evoked spike trains that can be used to distinguish between stimuli of different qualities and chemical compositions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17913985      PMCID: PMC2703738          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00920.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  36 in total

Review 1.  The neural code for taste in the brain stem: response profiles.

Authors:  P M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2000 Apr 1-15

Review 2.  Neuron types, receptors, behavior, and taste quality.

Authors:  M E Frank
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2000 Apr 1-15

3.  Temporal coding of contrast in primary visual cortex: when, what, and why.

Authors:  D S Reich; F Mechler; J D Victor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways.

Authors:  Yifeng Zhang; Mark A Hoon; Jayaram Chandrashekar; Ken L Mueller; Boaz Cook; Dianqing Wu; Charles S Zuker; Nicholas J P Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Gustatory processing is dynamic and distributed.

Authors:  Donald B Katz; Miguel A L Nicolelis; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  GABA-mediated corticofugal inhibition of taste-responsive neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  D V Smith; C S Li
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Neural coding mechanisms for flow rate in taste-responsive cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat.

Authors:  Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Dynamic and multimodal responses of gustatory cortical neurons in awake rats.

Authors:  D B Katz; S A Simon; M A Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Gustatory neuron types in rat geniculate ganglion.

Authors:  R F Lundy; R J Contreras
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors.

Authors:  J Chandrashekar; K L Mueller; M A Hoon; E Adler; L Feng; W Guo; C S Zuker; N J Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  24 in total

1.  18-Methoxycoronaridine, a potential anti-obesity agent, does not produce a conditioned taste aversion in rats.

Authors:  Olga D Taraschenko; Isabelle M Maisonneuve; Stanley D Glick
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Taste-specific cell assemblies in a biologically informed model of the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  Andrew M Rosen; Heike Sichtig; J David Schaffer; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Evidence for an integrated oral sensory module in the human anterior ventral insula.

Authors:  K Rudenga; B Green; D Nachtigal; D M Small
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Spike train analysis toolkit: enabling wider application of information-theoretic techniques to neurophysiology.

Authors:  David H Goldberg; Jonathan D Victor; Esther P Gardner; Daniel Gardner
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2009-05-28

5.  Recognizing Taste: Coding Patterns Along the Neural Axis in Mammals.

Authors:  Kathrin Ohla; Ryusuke Yoshida; Stephen D Roper; Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Jonathan D Victor; John D Boughter; Max Fletcher; Donald B Katz; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Taste coding in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the awake, freely licking rat.

Authors:  Andre T Roussin; Alexandra E D'Agostino; Andrew M Fooden; Jonathan D Victor; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Making time count: functional evidence for temporal coding of taste sensation.

Authors:  Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Sergey Leshchinskiy; Dana N Moroney; Jasen M Ozdoba
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Bitter-Induced Salivary Proteins Increase Detection Threshold of Quinine, But Not Sucrose.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Kristen E Kay; Ann-Marie Torregrossa
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Water as an independent taste modality.

Authors:  Andrew M Rosen; Andre T Roussin; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Quality time: representation of a multidimensional sensory domain through temporal coding.

Authors:  Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Jen-Yung Chen; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.