Literature DB >> 14523013

The efficiency and specificity of apurinic/apyrimidinic site bypass by human DNA polymerase eta and Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4.

Robert J Kokoska1, Scott D McCulloch, Thomas A Kunkel.   

Abstract

One of the most common DNA lesions arising in cells is an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site resulting from base loss. Although a template strand AP site impedes DNA synthesis, translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases can bypass an AP site. Because this bypass is expected to be highly mutagenic because of loss of base coding potential, here we quantify the efficiency and the specificity of AP site bypass by two Y family TLS enzymes, Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase 4 (Dpo4) and human DNA polymerase eta (Pol eta). During a single cycle of processive DNA synthesis, Dpo4 and Pol eta bypass synthetic AP sites with 13-30 and 10-13%, respectively, of the bypass efficiency for undamaged bases in the same sequence contexts. These efficiencies are higher than for the A family, exonuclease-deficient Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. We then determined AP site bypass specificity for complete bypass, requiring insertion or misalignment at the AP site followed by multiple incorporations using the aberrant primer templates. Although Dpo4, Pol eta, and Klenow polymerase have different fidelity when copying undamaged DNA, bypass of AP sites lacking A or G by all three polymerases is nearly 100% mutagenic. The majority (70-80%) of bypass events made by all three polymerases are insertion of dAMP opposite the AP site. Single base deletion errors comprise 10-25% of bypass events, with other base insertions observed at lower rates. Given that mammalian cells contain five polymerases implicated in TLS, and given that a large number of AP sites are generated per mammalian cell per day, even moderately efficient AP site bypass could be a source of substitution and frameshift mutagenesis in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14523013     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M308515200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  70 in total

1.  Identification of an unfolding intermediate for a DNA lesion bypass polymerase.

Authors:  Shanen M Sherrer; Brian A Maxwell; Lindsey R Pack; Kevin A Fiala; Jason D Fowler; Jun Zhang; Zucai Suo
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Structural basis for the dual coding potential of 8-oxoguanosine by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Luis G Brieba; Brandt F Eichman; Robert J Kokoska; Sylvie Doublié; Tom A Kunkel; Tom Ellenberger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Enzymatic switching for efficient and accurate translesion DNA replication.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Robert J Kokoska; Olga Chilkova; Carrie M Welch; Erik Johansson; Peter M J Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Roles of the Y-family DNA polymerase Dbh in accurate replication of the Sulfolobus genome at high temperature.

Authors:  Cynthia J Sakofsky; Patricia L Foster; Dennis W Grogan
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-02-04

5.  A unique error signature for human DNA polymerase nu.

Authors:  Mercedes E Arana; Kei-ichi Takata; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Richard D Wood; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-11-21

6.  Multiple solutions to inefficient lesion bypass by T7 DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-07-28

7.  Mechanism of template-independent nucleotide incorporation catalyzed by a template-dependent DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Kevin A Fiala; Jessica A Brown; Hong Ling; Ajay K Kshetry; Jun Zhang; John-Stephen Taylor; Wei Yang; Zucai Suo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

9.  Biochemical analysis of active site mutations of human polymerase η.

Authors:  Samuel C Suarez; Renee A Beardslee; Shannon M Toffton; Scott D McCulloch
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Steric and electrostatic effects at the C2 atom substituent influence replication and miscoding of the DNA deamination product deoxyxanthosine and analogs by DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Huidong Zhang; Urban Bren; Ivan D Kozekov; Carmelo J Rizzo; Donald F Stec; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.