J M Anderson1, J Murchison, D Patel. 1. Department of Radiology, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. judithanderson20@hotmail.com
Abstract
AIM: To determine factors influencing diagnostic yield in computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy of lung lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-five consecutive CT-guided lung biopsies were performed in 182 patients between August 1995 and September 2000 and either fine-needle aspirate samples for cytology or core biopsy samples for histology were collected. Procedures were divided into a diagnostic group (true-positive and true-negative results) and a non-diagnostic group (false-positive and false-negative results) and the factors affecting diagnostic accuracy assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-six lesions (86%) were malignant, and 26 (14%) were benign. More than one biopsy was performed for 12 lesions. One hundred and thirty-two biopsies were true-positive, 27 true-negative and 36 false-negative. No false-positive results occurred in the study. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 81.5%. Significantly more core biopsies than fine-needle aspirates were diagnostic: 93 versus 78% (p<0.005). No difference was found in frequency of pneumothorax between these two groups. There was a difference in the average depth from the pleural surface of lesions in the diagnostic and non-diagnostic groups, but this did not attain statistical significance: 9.8 versus 17.2 mm (p=0.054). CONCLUSION: In this study CT-guided lung biopsy core biopsy was a more accurate method of tissue sampling than fine-needle aspiration, and was not associated with an excess of complications.
AIM: To determine factors influencing diagnostic yield in computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy of lung lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-five consecutive CT-guided lung biopsies were performed in 182 patients between August 1995 and September 2000 and either fine-needle aspirate samples for cytology or core biopsy samples for histology were collected. Procedures were divided into a diagnostic group (true-positive and true-negative results) and a non-diagnostic group (false-positive and false-negative results) and the factors affecting diagnostic accuracy assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-six lesions (86%) were malignant, and 26 (14%) were benign. More than one biopsy was performed for 12 lesions. One hundred and thirty-two biopsies were true-positive, 27 true-negative and 36 false-negative. No false-positive results occurred in the study. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 81.5%. Significantly more core biopsies than fine-needle aspirates were diagnostic: 93 versus 78% (p<0.005). No difference was found in frequency of pneumothorax between these two groups. There was a difference in the average depth from the pleural surface of lesions in the diagnostic and non-diagnostic groups, but this did not attain statistical significance: 9.8 versus 17.2 mm (p=0.054). CONCLUSION: In this study CT-guided lung biopsy core biopsy was a more accurate method of tissue sampling than fine-needle aspiration, and was not associated with an excess of complications.
Authors: Helmut Prosch; Elisabeth Hoffmann; Klaus Bernhardt; Johann Schalleschak; Ewald Schober; Marcel Rowhani; Michael Weber; Gerhard Mostbeck Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-05-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christian Billich; Rainer Muche; Gerhard Brenner; Stefan A Schmidt; Stefan Krüger; Hans-Jürgen Brambs; Sandra Pauls Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 5.315