Literature DB >> 15609058

Value of high-resolution ultrasound in detecting a pneumothorax.

Myung Jin Chung1, Jin Mo Goo, Jung-Gi Im, Jae Min Cho, Sung Bum Cho, Seog Joon Kim.   

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the detectability of high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) and bedside chest radiography (CR) for a pneumothorax. During the last 14 months, 97 consecutive patients who were admitted to our institute to undergo a transthoracic needle aspiration and biopsy (TNAB) of the lung were included. Both HRUS and CR were performed immediately after the TNAB procedure. The HRUS images were saved in sequence using the cine-review mode and displayed as an animation on a workstation. Four radiologists independently analyzed both HRUS images and a soft copy of the CR on a diagnostic monitor and identified the pneumothorax. With CT as the reference standard, statistical parameters were calculated. From 97 patients, 35 pneumothorax cases were found on CT after the TNAB. The sensitivities in detecting the pneumothorax were 80 and 47% in HRUS and CR, respectively. The specificities were 94 and 94%. The diagnostic accuracies were 89 and 77%. The inter-observer agreement was excellent (kappa=0.85) in the HRUS images and moderate (kappa=0.49) in the CR. The results of this study suggest that HRUS is a more sensitive and confident method for diagnosing a pneumothorax when compared to bedside chest radiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15609058     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2518-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Sonographic diagnosis of a pneumothorax inapparent on plain radiography: confirmation by computed tomography.

Authors:  A W Kirkpatrick; A K Ng; S A Dulchavsky; I Lyburn; A Harris; W Torregianni; R K Simons; S Nicolaou
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-04

2.  Prospective evaluation of thoracic ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax.

Authors:  S A Dulchavsky; K L Schwarz; A W Kirkpatrick; R D Billica; D R Williams; L N Diebel; M R Campbell; A E Sargysan; D R Hamilton
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-02

3.  Transthoracic needle biopsy: factors effecting risk of pneumothorax.

Authors:  Uğur Topal; Bülent Ediz
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Diagnosis of pneumothorax by ultrasound immediately after ultrasonically guided aspiration biopsy.

Authors:  R Targhetta; J M Bourgeois; R Chavagneux; P Balmes
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Pneumothorax: evaluation by ultrasound--preliminary results.

Authors:  K Wernecke; M Galanski; P E Peters; J Hansen
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Detection and estimation of the volume of pneumothorax using real-time sonography: efficacy determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  C L Sistrom; C T Reiheld; S B Gay; K K Wallace
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The comet-tail artifact: an ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax.

Authors:  D Lichtenstein; G Mezière; P Biderman; A Gepner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Plain and computed radiography for detecting experimentally induced pneumothorax in cadavers: implications for detection in patients.

Authors:  J J Carr; J C Reed; R H Choplin; T L Pope; L D Case
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Distribution of pneumothorax in the supine and semirecumbent critically ill adult.

Authors:  I M Tocino; M H Miller; W R Fairfax
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  A bedside ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax in the critically ill. Lung sliding.

Authors:  D A Lichtenstein; Y Menu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax.

Authors:  Giovanni Volpicelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  From FAST to E-FAST: an overview of the evolution of ultrasound-based traumatic injury assessment.

Authors:  J Montoya; S P Stawicki; D C Evans; D P Bahner; S Sparks; R P Sharpe; J Cipolla
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Bedside US imaging in multiple trauma patients. Part 1: US findings and techniques.

Authors:  Soccorsa Sofia
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-10-31

Review 4.  Bedside ultrasonography for diagnosis of pneumothorax.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-08

5.  Pitfalls in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax.

Authors:  Johannes Retief; Michelle Chopra
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2016-11-23

6.  Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kenneth K Chan; Daniel A Joo; Andrew D McRae; Yemisi Takwoingi; Zahra A Premji; Eddy Lang; Abel Wakai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-23

7.  Emerging roles for transthoracic ultrasonography in pleuropulmonary pathology.

Authors:  Sergio Sartori; Paola Tombesi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-28

8.  An integrated approach for prescribing fewer chest x-rays in the ICU.

Authors:  Vincent Ioos; Arnaud Galbois; Ludivine Chalumeau-Lemoine; Bertrand Guidet; Eric Maury; Gilles Hejblum
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Extended-FAST plus MDCT in pneumothorax diagnosis of major trauma: time to revisit ATLS imaging approach?

Authors:  Stefania Ianniello; Claudia Lucia Piccolo; Margherita Trinci; Claudio A Ajmone Cat; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-11-04

Review 10.  Portable bedside ultrasound: the visual stethoscope of the 21st century.

Authors:  Lawrence M Gillman; Andrew W Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.