Literature DB >> 14520248

Selective underreporting of energy intake in women: magnitude, determinants, and effect of training.

Fernanda B Scagliusi1, Viviane O Polacow, Guilherme G Artioli, Fabiana B Benatti, Antonio H Lancha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify underreporting of energy intake in Brazilian women; identify underreporting determinants; find out if underreporting was selective and; test if a motivational multimethod training, in combination with providing the subjects some results from the prior recording period, was able to reduce underreporting.
DESIGN: Energy intake (EI) was assessed by a 7-day diet record. Energy expenditure (EE) was calculated by heart rate monitoring. EI:EE ratio lower than one in subjects who did not lose weight in one month was considered underreporting. Underreporting was correlated with anthropometric, behavioral, and psychological parameters. Food and nutrient consumption was compared between underreporters and non-underreporters. A focus group investigated the main causes of underreporting. Subjects were told that the earlier food records' results were unrealistic and submitted to a motivational training. Then, they were reevaluated for underreporting.
SUBJECTS: Subjects were recruited by advertisements for a physical activity program. Thirty-eight healthy women, 13 normal-weight (34%), 13 overweight (34%), and 12 obese (32%), enrolled in the study. Three subjects (2 normal-weight and 1 obese) (8%) withdrew. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED: Analysis of variance, paired t tests, and simple linear regression.
RESULTS: Seventeen women (49%) underreported their EI by 21%. A significant negative correlation was found between social desirability and EI:EE. Undereating, errors in portion sizes estimation and the inconvenience of having to record everything that was eaten seemed to explain underreporting. Mean portion sizes did not differ for underreporters and non-underreporters. Fewer self-reported years of education was correlated with underreporting only among normal-weight women. Training and confrontation with earlier results reduced underreporting rate to 33%, but did not affect macronutrient densities. Applications/conclusions Subjects tended to report their intake in a socially desirable way, by eating or reporting less frequently foods considered unhealthful or fattening, like sweets and fried foods. Inclusion of social desirability score as a covariate in studies that rely on self-reports of food intake may be useful. A motivational training program, developed in such a way that subjects are comfortable reporting intake of foods considered socially undesirable, in combination with confrontation with earlier results of dietary assessment and use of portion size measurement aids, can be used to attenuate underreporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14520248     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(03)01074-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  42 in total

1.  Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data.

Authors:  Amy F Subar; Laurence S Freedman; Janet A Tooze; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Carol Boushey; Marian L Neuhouser; Frances E Thompson; Nancy Potischman; Patricia M Guenther; Valerie Tarasuk; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Self-reported vs. actual energy intake in youth with and without loss of control eating.

Authors:  Laura E Wolkoff; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Lauren B Shomaker; Merel Kozlosky; Kelli M Columbo; Camden A Elliott; Lisa M Ranzenhofer; Robyn L Osborn; Susan Z Yanovski; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2010-09-18

3.  Internet delivered behavioral obesity treatment.

Authors:  Jean Harvey-Berino; Delia West; Rebecca Krukowski; Elaine Prewitt; Alan VanBiervliet; Takamaru Ashikaga; Joan Skelly
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Lowering the dietary omega-6: omega-3 does not hinder nonalcoholic fatty-liver disease development in a murine model.

Authors:  Reilly T Enos; Kandy T Velázquez; Jamie L McClellan; Taryn L Cranford; Michael D Walla; E Angela Murphy
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Dietary sugar intake was associated with increased body fatness but decreased cardiovascular mortality in Chinese elderly: an 11-year prospective study of Mr and Ms OS of Hong Kong.

Authors:  Z-M Liu; L A Tse; D Chan; C Wong; S Y S Wong
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Creatine supplementation prevents acute strength loss induced by concurrent exercise.

Authors:  Vítor de Salles Painelli; Victor Tavares Alves; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Fabiana Braga Benatti; Guilherme Giannini Artioli; Antonio Herbert Lancha; Bruno Gualano; Hamilton Roschel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Assessment of energy intake in women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a doubly labeled water method study.

Authors:  N Farooqi; F Slinde; L Håglin; T Sandström
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Computerized portion-size estimation compared to multiple 24-hour dietary recalls for measurement of fat, fruit, and vegetable intake in overweight adults.

Authors:  Deborah J Toobert; Lisa A Strycker; Sarah E Hampson; Erika Westling; Steven M Christiansen; Thomas G Hurley; James R Hébert
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-10

9.  Dietary behaviors and survival in people with head and neck cancer: Results from Head and Neck 5000.

Authors:  Samantha Lang; Sarah Schimansky; Rhona Beynon; Christopher Penfold; Amy Davies; Andrea Waylen; Steven Thomas; Miranda Pring; Michael Pawlita; Tim Waterboer; Andrew R Ness
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Offspring consume a more obesogenic diet than mothers in response to changing socioeconomic status and urbanization in Cebu, Philippines.

Authors:  Anna Kelles; Linda Adair
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.