Literature DB >> 14517169

Voltage and activation mapping: how the recording technique affects the outcome of catheter ablation procedures in patients with congenital heart disease.

Natasja M S de Groot1, Martin J Schalij, Katja Zeppenfeld, Nico A Blom, Enno T Van der Velde, Ernst E Van der Wall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endocardial mapping is mandatory before radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Mapping can be performed with either unipolar or bipolar recordings. Impact of the recording technique used was studied in patients with and without structural heart disease using the 3D electroanatomic CARTO mapping system. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients (n=44; 16 males; age 43+/-16 years) referred for RFCA of atrial flutter (AFL, n=18), focal atrial tachycardia (FAT, n=4), AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT, n=5), or scar-related atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART, n=17) were studied. Voltage and activation maps were constructed. Unipolar and bipolar voltage distribution in the different groups was studied to establish a cutoff voltage value to facilitate delineation of scar tissue. Electrograms were recorded during tachycardia (FAT: n=246, cycle length [CL]=449+/-35 ms; AVNRT: n=182, CL=359+/-47 ms; AFL: n=1164, CL=255+/-56 ms; IART: n=2431, CL=280+/-74 ms). Unipolar voltages were greater than bipolar voltages (P<0.001). Unipolar voltages < or =1.0 mV were equally distributed in both AFL and IART patients. Bipolar voltages < or =0.1 mV were only found in patients with IART, and subsequently 0.1 mV was used as the cutoff value to delineate scar tissue. No unipolar cutoff value could be established. Timing of unipolar and bipolar local activation was correlated in all patient groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The recording technique used has considerable impact on reconstruction of reentrant pathways and on the outcome of RFCA. In general, unipolar and bipolar recordings provide complementary information; however, only bipolar recordings allow voltage-based scar tissue delineation in patients with congenital heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14517169     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000092893.11893.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Modern mapping technologies : Technical background and clinical use].

Authors:  Felix Bourier; Frédéric Sacher
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-26

2.  Time- and frequency-domain analyses of atrial fibrillation activation rate: the optical mapping reference.

Authors:  Omer Berenfeld; Steve Ennis; Elliot Hwang; Brian Hooven; Krzysztof Grzeda; Sergey Mironov; Masatoshi Yamazaki; Jérôme Kalifa; José Jalife
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  A multi-purpose spiral high-density mapping catheter: initial clinical experience in complex atrial arrhythmias.

Authors:  David Gareth Jones; James W McCready; Riyaz A Kaba; Syed Y Ahsan; Jonathan C Lyne; Jack Wang; Oliver R Segal; Vias Markides; Pier D Lambiase; Tom Wong; Anthony W C Chow
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Ripple mapping: making electroanatomic mapping user-friendly.

Authors:  Roderick Tung; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  Maximizing the Effectiveness of Ablation for Arrhythmias in the Congenital Heart Patients.

Authors:  Aruna Arujuna; Joseph de Bono
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Permanent atrial pacing lead implant route after Fontan operation.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Takahashi; Frank Cecchin; Elizabeth Fortescue; Charles I Berul; Mark E Alexander; Edward P Walsh; Francis Fynn-Thompson; John K Triedman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Difficulties with ablation for arrhythmias in children.

Authors:  Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2008-05-01

8.  Electroanatomic contact mapping: how to use optimally to recognise the arrhythmia mechanism?

Authors:  Narayanan Namboodiri
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07

9.  Identification of Low-Voltage Areas: A Unipolar, Bipolar, and Omnipolar Perspective.

Authors:  Mathijs S van Schie; Rohit K Kharbanda; Charlotte A Houck; Eva A H Lanters; Yannick J H J Taverne; Ad J J C Bogers; Natasja M S de Groot
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Physiological Assessment of Ventricular Myocardial Voltage Using Omnipolar Electrograms.

Authors:  Karl Magtibay; Stéphane Massé; John Asta; Marjan Kusha; Patrick F H Lai; Mohammed Ali Azam; Andreu Porta-Sanchez; Shouvik Haldar; Daniel Malebranche; Christopher Labos; D Curtis Deno; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.