BACKGROUND: Atrial pacing is indicated for sinus node dysfunction (SND) after Fontan surgery; preferred lead implantation technique is debated. We compare outcomes of transvenous (TV) and epicardial (Epi) atrial lead implants in this population. METHODS: Retrospective review of Fontan patients undergoing atrial lead implant between 1992 and 2007. Demographics, lead performance data, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 78 patients had 90 leads implanted: 25 via TV route and 65 via Epi route. Median follow-up was 1.6 years (TV) and 3.6 years (Epi). TV leads were implanted in older patients (23.1 vs 9.3 years, P < 0.001) and at longer intervals after Fontan (15.2 vs 4.9 years, P < 0.001). Pacing indication for most TV leads was SND, while Epi leads were also indicated for atrioventricular block. Acute complication rates were similar (8% TV vs 19% Epi, P = 0.23), but median hospital stay was shorter for TV (2 vs 5 days, P = 0.03). Thrombus was observed in five patients (two in TV; three in Epi), but no thromboembolic events were observed. Mean lead survival was similar (TV 9.9 vs Epi 7.8 years, P = NS). Energy threshold was lower at implant for TV leads (0.9 vs 2.2 microJ, P = 0.049), but similar at follow-up (1.2 vs 2.6 microJ, P = 0.35). Atrial sensing was unchanged over time for TV (2.2 to 2.1 mV, P = NS), but decreased for Epi (3.3 to 2.5 mV, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to epicardial leads, transvenous atrial pacing leads may be placed in Fontan patients with lower procedural morbidity and equivalent expectation of lead performance and longevity.
BACKGROUND: Atrial pacing is indicated for sinus node dysfunction (SND) after Fontan surgery; preferred lead implantation technique is debated. We compare outcomes of transvenous (TV) and epicardial (Epi) atrial lead implants in this population. METHODS: Retrospective review of Fontan patients undergoing atrial lead implant between 1992 and 2007. Demographics, lead performance data, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 78 patients had 90 leads implanted: 25 via TV route and 65 via Epi route. Median follow-up was 1.6 years (TV) and 3.6 years (Epi). TV leads were implanted in older patients (23.1 vs 9.3 years, P < 0.001) and at longer intervals after Fontan (15.2 vs 4.9 years, P < 0.001). Pacing indication for most TV leads was SND, while Epi leads were also indicated for atrioventricular block. Acute complication rates were similar (8% TV vs 19% Epi, P = 0.23), but median hospital stay was shorter for TV (2 vs 5 days, P = 0.03). Thrombus was observed in five patients (two in TV; three in Epi), but no thromboembolic events were observed. Mean lead survival was similar (TV 9.9 vs Epi 7.8 years, P = NS). Energy threshold was lower at implant for TV leads (0.9 vs 2.2 microJ, P = 0.049), but similar at follow-up (1.2 vs 2.6 microJ, P = 0.35). Atrial sensing was unchanged over time for TV (2.2 to 2.1 mV, P = NS), but decreased for Epi (3.3 to 2.5 mV, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to epicardial leads, transvenous atrial pacing leads may be placed in Fontan patients with lower procedural morbidity and equivalent expectation of lead performance and longevity.
Authors: J S Sachweh; J F Vazquez-Jimenez; F A Schöndube; S H Daebritz; H Dörge; E G Mühler; B J Messmer Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Elizabeth B Fortescue; Charles I Berul; Frank Cecchin; Edward P Walsh; John K Triedman; Mark E Alexander Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: G C Beaufort-Krol; H Mulder; D Nagelkerke; T W Waterbolk; M T Bink-Boelkens Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Natasja M S de Groot; Martin J Schalij; Katja Zeppenfeld; Nico A Blom; Enno T Van der Velde; Ernst E Van der Wall Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M I Cohen; G Wernovsky; V L Vetter; T S Wieand; J W Gaynor; M L Jacobs; T L Spray; L A Rhodes Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-11-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Geoffrey D Huntley; Abhishek J Deshmukh; Carole A Warnes; Suraj Kapa; Alexander C Egbe Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Michael J Wallace; Mona El Refaey; Pietro Mesirca; Thomas J Hund; Matteo E Mangoni; Peter J Mohler Journal: Front Genet Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 4.599