Literature DB >> 14516650

Utility of PET in Breast Cancer.

Norbert Avril1, Marcus Schelling, Jorg Dose, Wolfgang A. Weber, Markus Schwaiger.   

Abstract

Breast cancer represents the most frequent malignant disease in women and the second leading cause of cancer death in western countries. Current available treatment includes surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. The disease is often curable when detected in early stages. Mammography is the most important screening modality; however, limitations of available procedures for the diagnosis and accurate staging of breast cancer has increased the application of metabolic imaging by positron emission tomography (PET). PET using the radiolabeled glucose analogue, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), enables visualization of increased glucose metabolism of malignant tissue. PET has been used successfully in an increasing number of oncological applications. It is an excellent clinical method to detect breast cancer over 1 cm in diameter and to accurately identify the extent of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with locally advanced disease. Recent reports have shown the high accuracy of FDG-PET imaging for staging of breast cancer patient by using whole-body PET imaging. The metabolic signal of tumor tissue allows for monitoring the effect of chemotherapy. FDG-PET can differentiate between responder and nonresponder early in the course of therapy. By identifying nonresponding patients, PET can help to avoid ineffective therapy and therefore, reduce toxic side effects in these patients.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 14516650     DOI: 10.1016/s1095-0397(99)00032-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging        ISSN: 1095-0397


  5 in total

Review 1.  PET/CT and breast cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Zangheri; Cristina Messa; Maria Picchio; Luigi Gianolli; Claudio Landoni; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Value of PET-FDG in primary breast cancer based on histopathological and immunohistochemical prognostic factors.

Authors:  Pierre Heudel; Sebastien Cimarelli; Anthony Montella; Catherine Bouteille; Thomas Mognetti
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Factors Associated with (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in T1 and T2 Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.

Authors:  So Jung Kim; Seong-Jang Kim; In Joo Kim; Kyoungjune Pak; Bum Soo Kim; Seunghyeon Shin
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-23

Review 5.  The choice of the correct imaging modality in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 9.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.