In this paper, a three-dimensional (3D) NMR-based approach for the determination of the fold of moderately sized proteins by solid-state magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR is presented and applied to the alpha-spectrin SH3 domain. This methodology includes the measurement of multiple (13)C-(13)C distance restraints on biosynthetically site-directed (13)C-enriched samples, obtained by growing bacteria on [2-(13)C]glycerol and [1,3-(13)C]glycerol. 3D (15)N-(13)C-(13)C dipolar correlation experiments were applied to resolve overlap of signals, in particular in the region where backbone carbon-carbon correlations of the C(alpha)-C(alpha), CO-CO, C(alpha)-CO, and CO-C(alpha) type appear. Additional restraints for confining the structure were obtained from phi and psi backbone torsion angles of 29 residues derived from C(alpha), C(beta), CO, NH, and H(alpha) chemical shifts. Using both distance and angular restraints, a refined structure was calculated with a backbone root-mean-square deviation of 0.7 A with respect to the average structure.
In this paper, a three-dimensional (3D) NMR-based approach for the determination of the fold of moderately sized proteins by solid-state magic-angle spinning (n class="Disease">MAS) NMR is presented and applied to the alpha-spectrin SH3 domain. This methodology includes the measurement of multiple (13)C-(13)C distance restraints on biosynthetically site-directed (13)C-enriched samples, obtained by growing bacteria on [2-(13)C]glycerol and [1,3-(13)C]glycerol. 3D (15)N-(13)C-(13)C dipolar correlation experiments were applied to resolve overlap of signals, in particular in the region where backbone carbon-carboncorrelations of the C(alpha)-C(alpha), CO-CO, C(alpha)-CO, and CO-C(alpha) type appear. Additional restraints for confining the structure were obtained from phi and psi backbone torsion angles of 29 residues derived from C(alpha), C(beta), CO, NH, and H(alpha) chemical shifts. Using both distance and angular restraints, a refined structure was calculated with a backbone root-mean-square deviation of 0.7 A with respect to the average structure.
Authors: Benjamin J Wylie; Lindsay J Sperling; Andrew J Nieuwkoop; W Trent Franks; Eric Oldfield; Chad M Rienstra Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Matthew T Eddy; Marina Belenky; Astrid C Sivertsen; Robert G Griffin; Judith Herzfeld Journal: J Biomol NMR Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 2.835
Authors: Maurizio Pellecchia; Ivano Bertini; David Cowburn; Claudio Dalvit; Ernest Giralt; Wolfgang Jahnke; Thomas L James; Steve W Homans; Horst Kessler; Claudio Luchinat; Bernd Meyer; Hartmut Oschkinat; Jeff Peng; Harald Schwalbe; Gregg Siegal Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Qing Zhe Ni; Evgeny Markhasin; Thach V Can; Björn Corzilius; Kong Ooi Tan; Alexander B Barnes; Eugenio Daviso; Yongchao Su; Judith Herzfeld; Robert G Griffin Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Victoria A Higman; Jeremy Flinders; Matthias Hiller; Stefan Jehle; Stefan Markovic; Sebastian Fiedler; Barth-Jan van Rossum; Hartmut Oschkinat Journal: J Biomol NMR Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 2.835