Literature DB >> 14511488

Epigenetic asymmetry in the mammalian zygote and early embryo: relationship to lineage commitment?

Wolf Reik1, Fatima Santos, Kohzoh Mitsuya, Hugh Morgan, Wendy Dean.   

Abstract

Epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes and embryonic lineages exists at the earliest stages of mammalian development. The maternal genome in the zygote is highly methylated in both its DNA and its histones and most imprinted genes have maternal germline methylation imprints. The paternal genome is rapidly remodelled with protamine removal, addition of acetylated histones, and rapid demethylation of DNA before replication. A minority of imprinted genes have paternal germline methylation imprints. Methylation and chromatin reprogramming continues during cleavage divisions, but at the blastocyst stage lineage commitment to inner cell mass (ICM) or trophectoderm (TE) fate is accompanied by a dramatic increase in DNA and histone methylation, predominantly in the ICM. This may set up major epigenetic differences between embryonic and extraembryonic tissues, including in X-chromosome inactivation and perhaps imprinting. Maintaining epigenetic asymmetry appears important for development as asymmetry is lost in cloned embryos, most of which have developmental defects, and in particular an imbalance between extraembryonic and embryonic tissue development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14511488      PMCID: PMC1693238          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  61 in total

1.  Absence of genome-wide changes in DNA methylation during development of the zebrafish.

Authors:  D Macleod; V H Clark; A Bird
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome.

Authors:  W Mayer; A Niveleau; J Walter; R Fundele; T Haaf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An intragenic methylated region in the imprinted Igf2 gene augments transcription.

Authors:  A Murrell; S Heeson; L Bowden; M Constância; W Dean; G Kelsey; W Reik
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Genome-wide methylation patterns in normal and uniparental early mouse embryos.

Authors:  S C Barton; K L Arney; W Shi; A Niveleau; R Fundele; M A Surani; T Haaf
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Imprinting and the epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes.

Authors:  A C Ferguson-Smith; M A Surani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene.

Authors:  A C Bell; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus.

Authors:  A T Hark; C J Schoenherr; D J Katz; R S Ingram; J M Levorse; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A histone H3 methyltransferase controls DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  H Tamaru; E U Selker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote.

Authors:  J Oswald; S Engemann; N Lane; W Mayer; A Olek; R Fundele; W Dean; W Reik; J Walter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methylation patterns in bovine cloned embryos.

Authors:  D Bourc'his; D Le Bourhis; D Patin; A Niveleau; P Comizzoli; J P Renard; E Viegas-Péquignot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  21 in total

1.  Epigenesis versus preformation during mammalian development. Introduction.

Authors:  R L Gardner; M A Surani; D Solter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Analysis of the Xist RNA isoforms suggests two distinctly different forms of regulation.

Authors:  Mingchao Ma; William M Strauss
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Difference between random and imprinted X inactivation in common voles.

Authors:  Elena V Dementyeva; Alexander I Shevchenko; Olga V Anopriyenko; Nina A Mazurok; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Transcriptional Regulation of the First Cell Fate Decision.

Authors:  Catherine Rhee; Jonghwan Kim; Haley O Tucker
Journal:  J Dev Biol Regen Med       Date:  2017-10-26

Review 5.  Epigenetic responses to environmental change and their evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Bryan M Turner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Epigenetic disruptions of histone signatures for the trophectoderm and inner cell mass in mouse parthenogenetic embryos.

Authors:  Yi-Hui Chen; John Yu
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Origin of cellular asymmetries in the pre-implantation mouse embryo: a hypothesis.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Takaoka; Hiroshi Hamada
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Hypomethylation of functional retrotransposon-derived genes in the human placenta.

Authors:  Erin C Macaulay; Robert J Weeks; Simon Andrews; Ian M Morison
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Histone H3 lysine 27 methylation asymmetry on developmentally-regulated promoters distinguish the first two lineages in mouse preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  John Arne Dahl; Andrew H Reiner; Arne Klungland; Teruhiko Wakayama; Philippe Collas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MLL2 is required in oocytes for bulk histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation and transcriptional silencing.

Authors:  Claudia V Andreu-Vieyra; Ruihong Chen; Julio E Agno; Stefan Glaser; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; A Francis Stewart; Martin M Matzuk
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.