Literature DB >> 14505160

Daily activities: exploring their spectrum and prognostic impact in older, chemotherapy-treated lung cancer patients.

Aminah Jatoi1, Shauna Hillman, Philip J Stella, James A Mailliard, Jeff Sloan, Stephanie Vanone, Michael W Cannon, Leila Kutteh, Anne Kanard, James R Jett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Performance scores predict benefits and toxicities from chemotherapy. Among older cancer patients, however, many investigators have empirically called for a detailed assessment of activities of daily living, claiming that the utility of performance scores is limited in this older population. This study's goals were therefore twofold: (1). to explore the predictive capability of an activities questionnaire and of performance score with respect to chemotherapy's toxicity and efficacy; (2). to describe the daily activities of older patients as they undergo chemotherapy for incurable metastatic lung cancer.
METHODS: As part of a multi-institutional therapeutic trial, this study included 48 patients >or=65 years of age with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. All were assigned an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score and completed an activity questionnaire (Voorrips) prior to the initiation of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Patients were monitored for toxicity (CTC, version 2) and cancer status.
RESULTS: Within this cohort, ECOG performance scores were poor at predicting grade 3 or worse toxic events ( P=0.71, Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared). In contrast, the activity questionnaire categories did predict grade 3 or worse toxicity ( P=0.03) with a positive association observed between greater levels of activity and lower toxicity rates. Neither instrument predicted 90-day disease progression, although there was a trend that suggested a positive association between favorable scores and lower progression rates ( P=0.051). Patients described a broad range of daily activities.
CONCLUSION: Activity questionnaires capture a broad range of data that may prove useful in predicting toxicity among older cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14505160     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-003-0449-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Joan H Schiller; David Harrington; Chandra P Belani; Corey Langer; Alan Sandler; James Krook; Junming Zhu; David H Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comprehensive geriatric assessment adds information to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in elderly cancer patients: an Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology Study.

Authors:  Lazzaro Repetto; Lucia Fratino; Riccardo A Audisio; Antonella Venturino; Walter Gianni; Marina Vercelli; Stefano Parodi; Denise Dal Lago; Flora Gioia; Silvio Monfardini; Matti S Aapro; Diego Serraino; Vittorina Zagonel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  The comprehensive geriatric assessment: when, where, how.

Authors:  R Bernabei; V Venturiero; P Tarsitani; G Gambassi
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 4.  The application of the principles of geriatrics to the management of the older person with cancer.

Authors:  L Balducci; C Beghe
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Performance status rather than age is the key prognostic factor in second-line treatment of elderly patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo Gronlund; Claus Høgdall; Heine H Hansen; Svend A Engelholm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  A physical activity questionnaire for the elderly.

Authors:  L E Voorrips; A C Ravelli; P C Dongelmans; P Deurenberg; W A Van Staveren
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Performance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability study.

Authors:  J B Sørensen; M Klee; T Palshof; H H Hansen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Prognostic value of performance status assessed by patients themselves, nurses, and oncologists in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Ando; Y Ando; Y Hasegawa; K Shimokata; H Minami; K Wakai; Y Ohno; S Sakai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating biomarkers into cancer and aging research.

Authors:  Joleen M Hubbard; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Molecular mechanisms underlying skeletal muscle weakness in human cancer: reduced myosin-actin cross-bridge formation and kinetics.

Authors:  Michael J Toth; Mark S Miller; Damien M Callahan; Andrew P Sweeny; Ivette Nunez; Steven M Grunberg; Hirak Der-Torossian; Marion E Couch; Kim Dittus
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-02-14

Review 3.  Nutritional support in multimodal therapy for cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Ingvar Bosaeus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Feasibility of Fitness Tracker Usage to Assess Activity Level and Toxicities in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  William H Ward; Caitlin R Meeker; Elizabeth Handorf; Maureen V Hill; Margret Einarson; R Katherine Alpaugh; Thomas L Holden; Igor Astsaturov; Crystal S Denlinger; Michael J Hall; Sanjay S Reddy; Elin R Sigurdson; Efrat Dotan; Matthew Zibelman; Joshua E Meyer; Jeffrey M Farma; Namrata Vijayvergia
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-01

5.  Changes in daily activities of cancer patients after diagnosis: how do canadian and Iranian patients perceive the change?

Authors:  Javad Shahidi; Ali Taghizadeh-Kermani; Mahmood Reza Gohari; Mohammad Reza Ghavamnasiri; Fahimeh Khoshroo; Leila Pourali; S Robin Cohen
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

Review 6.  Discerning primary and secondary factors responsible for clinical fatigue in multisystem diseases.

Authors:  David Maughan; Michael Toth
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.