Literature DB >> 1956274

A physical activity questionnaire for the elderly.

L E Voorrips1, A C Ravelli, P C Dongelmans, P Deurenberg, W A Van Staveren.   

Abstract

A validated physical activity questionnaire for young adults was adapted and validated for use in free living, apparently healthy people, aged 63-80 yr. Test-retest reliability of the questionnaire on 29 participants was 0.89 as determined by Spearman's correlation coefficient. Further classification by tertiles of activity resulted in 72% of the participants being correctly classified and 0% grossly misclassified on two separate occasions. In a similar group of 31 subjects, classifications based on questionnaire activity scores were compared with classifications obtained by repeated 24-h activity recalls and pedometer measurements, showing Spearman's correlations of 0.78 and 0.73, for both methods, respectively. Seventy-one and 67% of the subjects, respectively, were classified in the same activity tertile for both methods. It is concluded that the questionnaire provides a reliable and valid method for classifying elderly subjects into categories of high, medium, and low physical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1956274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  140 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults.

Authors:  C E Tudor-Locke; A M Myers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Aerobic determinants of the decline in preferred walking speed in healthy, active 65- and 80-year-olds.

Authors:  Davide Malatesta; David Simar; Yves Dauvilliers; Robin Candau; Helmi Ben Saad; Christian Préfaut; Corinne Caillaud
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 3.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Association between physical activity, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and prostate volume.

Authors:  Jay H Fowke; Sharon Phillips; Tatsuki Koyama; Susan Byerly; Raoul Concepcion; Saundra S Motley; Peter E Clark
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Intramyocellular lipid accumulation is associated with permanent relocation ex vivo and in vitro of fatty acid translocase (FAT)/CD36 in obese patients.

Authors:  C Aguer; J Mercier; C Yong Wai Man; L Metz; S Bordenave; K Lambert; E Jean; L Lantier; L Bounoua; J F Brun; E Raynaud de Mauverger; F Andreelli; M Foretz; M Kitzmann
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Ecological momentary assessment of fatigue following breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Shelly L Curran; Abbie O Beacham; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-10

8.  Factors influencing cortisol level and slope among community dwelling older adults in Minnesota.

Authors:  Gillian H Ice
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2005-06

9.  Falls and health status in elderly women following first eye cataract surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  R H Harwood; A J E Foss; F Osborn; R M Gregson; A Zaman; T Masud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  A review of physical activity measures used among US Latinos: guidelines for developing culturally appropriate measures.

Authors:  Suzanna M Martinez; Barbara E Ainsworth; John P Elder
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.