PURPOSE: To appraise the performance of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in elderly cancer patients (> or = 65 years) and to evaluate whether it could add further information with respect to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 363 elderly cancer patients (195 males, 168 females; median age, 72 years) with solid (n = 271) or hematologic (n = 92) tumors. In addition to PS, their physical function was assessed by means of the activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales. Comorbidities were categorized according to Satariano's index. The association between PS, comorbidity, and the items of the CGA was assessed by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: These 363 elderly cancer patients had a good functional and mental status: 74% had a good PS (ie, lower than 2), 86% were ADL-independent, and 52% were IADL-independent. Forty-one percent of patients had one or more comorbid conditions. Of the patients with a good PS, 13.0% had two or more comorbidities; 9.3% and 37.7% had ADL or IADL limitations, respectively. By multivariate analysis, elderly cancer patients who were ADL-dependent or IADL-dependent had a nearly two-fold higher probability of having an elevated Satariano's index than independent patients. A strong association emerged between PS and CGA, with a nearly five-fold increased probability of having a poor PS (ie, > or = 2) recorded in patients dependent for ADL or IADL. CONCLUSION: The CGA adds substantial information on the functional assessment of elderly cancer patients, including patients with a good PS. The role of PS as unique marker of functional status needs to be reappraised among elderly cancer patients.
PURPOSE: To appraise the performance of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in elderly cancerpatients (> or = 65 years) and to evaluate whether it could add further information with respect to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 363 elderly cancerpatients (195 males, 168 females; median age, 72 years) with solid (n = 271) or hematologic (n = 92) tumors. In addition to PS, their physical function was assessed by means of the activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales. Comorbidities were categorized according to Satariano's index. The association between PS, comorbidity, and the items of the CGA was assessed by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: These 363 elderly cancerpatients had a good functional and mental status: 74% had a good PS (ie, lower than 2), 86% were ADL-independent, and 52% were IADL-independent. Forty-one percent of patients had one or more comorbid conditions. Of the patients with a good PS, 13.0% had two or more comorbidities; 9.3% and 37.7% had ADL or IADL limitations, respectively. By multivariate analysis, elderly cancerpatients who were ADL-dependent or IADL-dependent had a nearly two-fold higher probability of having an elevated Satariano's index than independent patients. A strong association emerged between PS and CGA, with a nearly five-fold increased probability of having a poor PS (ie, > or = 2) recorded in patients dependent for ADL or IADL. CONCLUSION: The CGA adds substantial information on the functional assessment of elderly cancerpatients, including patients with a good PS. The role of PS as unique marker of functional status needs to be reappraised among elderly cancerpatients.
Authors: John F Seymour; Pierre Fenaux; Lewis R Silverman; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Alan F List; Steven D Gore; Jay Backstrom; David McKenzie; C L Beach Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ranjana H Advani; Haiyan Chen; Thomas M Habermann; Vicki A Morrison; Edie A Weller; Richard I Fisher; Bruce A Peterson; Randy D Gascoyne; Sandra J Horning Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Ralph Simanek; Michael Wuensch; Roland Edlinger; Bernhard Hammerl-Ferrari; Ludwig Kramer; Klaus Geissler Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Jin Won Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Hyun Chang; Jeong-Ok Lee; Kwang-Il Kim; Soo-Mee Bang; Jong Seok Lee; Cheol-Ho Kim; Jee Hyun Kim Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Der Sheng Sun; Eun Kyoung Jeon; Hye Sung Won; Ji Chan Park; Byoung Young Shim; Suk Young Park; Young Seon Hong; Hoon Kyo Kim; Yoon Ho Ko Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: Trevor A Jolly; Allison M Deal; Kirsten A Nyrop; Grant R Williams; Mackenzi Pergolotti; William A Wood; Shani M Alston; Brittaney-Belle E Gordon; Samara A Dixon; Susan G Moore; W Chris Taylor; Michael Messino; Hyman B Muss Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-03-12