Literature DB >> 14504752

[Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy].

U Michl1, M Graefen, J Noldus, T Eggert, H Huland.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer can be performed by various techniques using a retropubic, perineal, or laparoscopic approach. Besides tumor control, the postoperative urinary continence rates and potency rates impact patients' quality of life after radical prostatectomy. This paper shows the results of our own center and compares the data in the literature regarding functional results of radical prostatectomy with respect to various operative techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14504752     DOI： 10.1007/s00120-003-0431-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN： 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  36 in total

1.  Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Thierry Roumeguere; Renaud Bollens; Marc Vanden Bossche; Dan Rochet; David Bialek; Paul Hoffman; Thierry Quackels; Amir Damoun; Eric Wespes; Claude C Schulman; Alexandre R Zlotta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Urinary function after radical prostatectomy: a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches.

Authors:  M Gray; G R Petroni; D Theodorescu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre De La Taille; Leif E Olsson; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Urinary continence and erectile function: a prospective evaluation of functional results after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Ran Katz; Alexandre De La Taille; Fabien Saint; Dimitrios Vordos; Anthony Cicco; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clement-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: oncological outcome during a 20-year period.

Authors:  C E Iselin; J E Robertson; D F Paulson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Othmar Seemann; Michael Schulze; Dogu Teber; Martin Hatzinger; Thomas Frede
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  [Potency-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].

Authors:  G Jakse; B Brehmer; H Borchers; A Verger-Kuhnke; S Biesterfeld
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Long-term cancer control of radical prostatectomy in men younger than 50 years of age: update 2003.

Authors:  Masood A Khan; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Jonathan I Epstein; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  A longitudinal assessment of bowel related symptoms and fecal incontinence following radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Philipp Dahm; Ari D Silverstein; Alon Z Weizer; Matthew D Young; Johannes Vieweg; David M Albala; David F Paulson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450
View more
  10 in total

1.  [Technique of nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Graefen; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Laparoscopic pelvic surgery: Where do we stand in the year 2006?].

Authors:  J Rassweiler; D Teber; J de la Rosette; P Laguna; V Pansodoro; T Frede
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Seminal vesicle sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].

Authors:  S Schäfers; P de Geeter; H Löhmer; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Endoscopic perineal approach to the presacral space: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Dorothée H Nieuwenhuis; Sergio J Bardaro; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [Erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Nocturnal early erection as a parameter of postoperative organic erectile integrity].

Authors:  A Bannowsky; H Schulze; C van der Horst; J H Stübinger; F J Martinez Portillo; K P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  [Pathophysiology and rehabilitation of erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  C van der Horst; F J Martinez-Portillo; K P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Markus Graefen; Mario Zacharias; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Thorsten Schlomm; Jochen Walz; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: do older patients have an increased risk?].

Authors:  H Borrusch; G Müller; U Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Neuroanatomical study of periprostatic nerve distributions using human cadaver prostate.

Authors:  Wooseuk Sung; Sun Lee; Yong-Koo Park; Sung-Goo Chang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 10.  Counseling patients about sexual health when considering post-prostatectomy radiation treatment.

Authors:  D Wittmann; J E Montie; D A Hamstra; H Sandler; D P Wood
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.896
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.