Literature DB >> 14501929

Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale.

James O Sanders1, David W Polly, William Cats-Baril, JoAnn Jones, Larry G Lenke, Michael F O'Brien, B Stephens Richards, Daniel J Sucato.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) compared with clinical parameters and written descriptions of the deformity from idiopathic scoliosis patients and their parents. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The WRVAS demonstrates seven visible aspects of spinal deformity in an analogue scale. Higher scores reflect worsening deformity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The WRVAS was administered to 182 idiopathic scoliosis patients at four centers in conjunction with open-ended questions about patients' and their parents' perceptions of their spinal deformity. The open-ended responses were categorized as either "deformity noted" or "no deformity noted."
RESULTS: WRVAS scores strongly correlate with curve magnitude (P = 0.01) and clearly differentiates curves of 30 degrees or more from lesser curves. Among treatment groups, patients with surgery recommended had significantly higher scores than that of other patients. The instrument differentiated those noting no deformity from those noting a deformity. The correlation between patients' and parents' scores was high (Spearman's rho = 0.8). When a deformity was noted, parents gave higher scores than did their children for rib prominence, shoulder level, scapular rotation, and the total score, but not for the other dimensions.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing scores of the WRVAS are strongly correlated with curve magnitude lending construct validity to this type of assessment tool. Patients with "surgery recommended" report more visible deformity on the scale than observed, braced, and postoperative patients, supporting the hypothesis that surgery improves the perceived appearance. Parents perceive more deformity of the ribs and shoulders more than did the patients, but other aspects of the deformity are identified equally. WRVAS scores correlate significantly with curve magnitude and treatment. Parents and patients have similar scores, but with parents perceiving more deformity of the ribs and shoulders than patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14501929     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084629.97042.0B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  31 in total

1.  Does patient perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical balance?

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Juan Bagó; Elisabetta D'Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A validation study on the traditional Chinese version of Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Ajax Hong Yin Lau; Jack Chau; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Kwong Man Lee; Yong Qiu; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng; Tsz Ping Lam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp; Georg Gosheger; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias Lange; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Cody Eric Bünger; Thomas Andersen; Haolin Sun; Chunsen Wu; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Analysis of factors that affect shoulder balance after correction surgery in scoliosis: a global analysis of all the curvature types.

Authors:  Jae-Young Hong; Seung-Woo Suh; Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Si-Young Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The body image disturbance questionnaire-scoliosis better correlates to quality of life measurements than the spinal assessment questionnaire in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jennifer M Bauer
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-04-30

7.  Clinically orientated classification incorporating shoulder balance for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H B Elsebaie; Z Dannawi; F Altaf; A Zaidan; M Al Mukhtar; M J Shaw; A Gibson; H Noordeen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): a new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Juan Bago; Judith Sanchez-Raya; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Jose Maria Climent
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-03-25

9.  A review of the trunk surface metrics used as Scoliosis and other deformities evaluation indices.

Authors:  Petros Patias; Theodoros B Grivas; Angelos Kaspiris; Costas Aggouris; Evangelos Drakoutos
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-06-29

10.  Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve.

Authors:  Xu-sheng Qiu; Wei-wei Ma; Wei-guo Li; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Ze-zhang Zhu; Bang-ping Qian; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun; Bobby K W Ng; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.