Literature DB >> 14501454

Cochlear nerve stimulation with a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array.

Todd Hillman1, Arun N Badi, Richard A Normann, Tom Kertesz, Clough Shelton.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: An array of penetrating microelectrodes can be implanted into the cochlear nerve to produce stable evoked responses with important electrophysiologic advantages over conventional electrode technology.
BACKGROUND: A totally implantable cochlear implant system would benefit from new electrode technology that lowers the current required for stimulation. Modern cochlear implant arrays placed in the scala tympani have an appreciable distance between the electrodes and the cochlear nerve, the site of intended stimulation. This distance can create the problem of cross-talk, limiting the number of electrodes that can represent discrete frequencies over a given length as well as significantly increasing stimulation thresholds and producing nonfocal stimulation of the fibers in the nerve. An electrode in direct contact with neurons in the cochlear nerve could reduce these problems. The Utah Electrode Array is a novel, three-dimensional, penetrating electrode array intended for direct neural stimulation with the potential ability to implant up to 200 electrodes directly into the cochlear nerve.
METHODS: Arrays containing 6 to 19 electrodes were implanted acutely into six separate cat cochlear nerves for analysis. Thresholds and input/output functions were measured with electrically induced auditory brainstem responses.
RESULTS: Current injections in 38 of 70 implanted electrodes produced stable brainstem responses after implantation. The median threshold was 15 microA.
CONCLUSIONS: An array of penetrating electrodes can be implanted into the cochlear nerve and used to evoke brainstem responses. The responses are of low threshold and are stable. Arrays of electrodes, inserted into auditory nerve, could form the neural interfaces for the next generation of auditory prostheses.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14501454     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200309000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  13 in total

1.  A lithographically-patterned, elastic multi-electrode array for surface stimulation of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Kathleen W Meacham; Richard J Giuly; Liang Guo; Shawn Hochman; Stephen P DeWeerth
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.838

2.  Non-rectangular waveforms for neural stimulation with practical electrodes.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Yanmei Tie
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Finite element analysis of a floating microstimulator.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Syed S Ur-Rahman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Interaction of neurotrophin signaling with Bcl-2 localized to the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum on spiral ganglion neuron survival and neurite growth.

Authors:  John P Renton; Ningyong Xu; J Jason Clark; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 5.  Challenges in Improving Cochlear Implant Performance and Accessibility.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-30

7.  Multiple factors may influence the performance of a visual prosthesis based on intracortical microstimulation: nonhuman primate behavioural experimentation.

Authors:  K Torab; T S Davis; D J Warren; P A House; R A Normann; B Greger
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.

Authors:  Alexis T Roy; Patpong Jiradejvong; Courtney Carver; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Spatial and temporal characteristics of V1 microstimulation during chronic implantation of a microelectrode array in a behaving macaque.

Authors:  T S Davis; R A Parker; P A House; E Bagley; S Wendelken; R A Normann; B Greger
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.