OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a general practice based, proactive system of asthma care in children. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with cluster sampling by general practice. SETTING:General practices in the northern region of the Australian Capital Territory. PARTICIPANTS: 174 children with moderate to severe asthma who attended 24 general practitioners. INTERVENTION: System of structured asthma care (the 3+ visit plan), with participating families reminded to attend the general practitioner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Process measures: rates for asthma consultations with general practitioner, written asthma plans, completion of the 3+ visit plan; clinical measures: rates for emergency department visits for asthma, days absent from school, symptom-free days, symptoms over the past year, activity limitation over the past year, and asthma drug use over the past year; spirometric lung function measures before and after cold air challenge. RESULTS: Intervention group children had significantly more asthma related consultations (odds ratio for three or more asthma related consultations 3.8 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 7.6; P = 0.0001), written asthma plans (2.2 (1.2 to 4.1); P = 0.01), and completed 3+ visit plans (24.2 (5.7 to 103.2); P = 0.0001) than control children and a mean reduction in measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second after cold air challenge of 2.6% (1.7 to 3.5); P = 0.0001) less than control children. The number needed to treat (benefit) for one additional written asthma action plan was 5 (3 to 41) children. Intervention group children had lower emergency department attendance rates for asthma (odds ratio 0.4 (0.2 to 1.04); P = 0.06) and less speech limiting wheeze (0.2 (0.1 to 0.4); P = 0.0001) than control children and were more likely to use a spacer (2.8 (1.6 to 4.7); P = 0.0001). No differences occurred in number of days absent from school or symptom-free day scores. CONCLUSIONS:Proactive care with active recall for children with moderate to severe asthma is feasible in general practice and seems to be beneficial.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a general practice based, proactive system of asthma care in children. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with cluster sampling by general practice. SETTING: General practices in the northern region of the Australian Capital Territory. PARTICIPANTS: 174 children with moderate to severe asthma who attended 24 general practitioners. INTERVENTION: System of structured asthma care (the 3+ visit plan), with participating families reminded to attend the general practitioner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Process measures: rates for asthma consultations with general practitioner, written asthma plans, completion of the 3+ visit plan; clinical measures: rates for emergency department visits for asthma, days absent from school, symptom-free days, symptoms over the past year, activity limitation over the past year, and asthma drug use over the past year; spirometric lung function measures before and after cold air challenge. RESULTS: Intervention group children had significantly more asthma related consultations (odds ratio for three or more asthma related consultations 3.8 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 7.6; P = 0.0001), written asthma plans (2.2 (1.2 to 4.1); P = 0.01), and completed 3+ visit plans (24.2 (5.7 to 103.2); P = 0.0001) than control children and a mean reduction in measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second after cold air challenge of 2.6% (1.7 to 3.5); P = 0.0001) less than control children. The number needed to treat (benefit) for one additional written asthma action plan was 5 (3 to 41) children. Intervention group children had lower emergency department attendance rates for asthma (odds ratio 0.4 (0.2 to 1.04); P = 0.06) and less speech limiting wheeze (0.2 (0.1 to 0.4); P = 0.0001) than control children and were more likely to use a spacer (2.8 (1.6 to 4.7); P = 0.0001). No differences occurred in number of days absent from school or symptom-free day scores. CONCLUSIONS: Proactive care with active recall for children with moderate to severe asthma is feasible in general practice and seems to be beneficial.
Authors: E J Comino; C A Mitchell; A Bauman; R L Henry; C F Robertson; M J Abramson; R Ruffin; L Landau Journal: Med J Aust Date: 1996-04-01 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Anne-Louise Ponsonby; Paul Gatenby; Nicholas Glasgow; Raymond Mullins; Tim McDonald; Mark Hurwitz Journal: Chest Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: A L Ponsonby; N Glasgow; P Gatenby; R Mullins; T McDonald; M Hurwitz; B Pradith; R Attewell Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: P G Gibson; H Powell; J Coughlan; A J Wilson; M Abramson; P Haywood; A Bauman; M J Hensley; E H Walters Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2003
Authors: M I Asher; U Keil; H R Anderson; R Beasley; J Crane; F Martinez; E A Mitchell; N Pearce; B Sibbald; A W Stewart Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Sande O Okelo; Arlene M Butz; Ritu Sharma; Gregory B Diette; Samantha I Pitts; Tracy M King; Shauna T Linn; Manisha Reuben; Yohalakshmi Chelladurai; Karen A Robinson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Christopher Licskai; Todd Sands; Michael Ong; Lisa Paolatto; Ivan Nicoletti Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 2.038