BACKGROUND: Long term follow up shows a high frequency of developmental disturbances in preterm survivors of neonatal intensive care formerly considered non-disabled. AIMS: To develop and validate an assessment tool that can help paediatricians to identify before 6 years of age which survivors have developmental disturbances that may interfere with normal education and normal life. METHODS: A total of 431 very premature infants, mean gestational age 30.2 weeks, mean birth weight 1276 g, were studied at age 5 years. Children with severe handicaps were excluded. The percentage of children with a correctly identified developmental disturbance in the domains cognition, speech and language development, neuromotor development, and behaviour were determined. RESULTS: The follow up instrument classified 67% as optimal and 33% as at risk or abnormal. Of the children classified as at risk or abnormal, 60% had not been identified at earlier follow up assessments. The combined set of standardised tests identified a further 30% with mild motor, cognitive, or behavioural disturbances. The paediatrician's assessment had a specificity of 88% (95% CI 83-93%), a sensitivity of 48% (95% CI 42-58%), a positive predictive value of 85% (95% CI 78-91%), and a negative predictive value of 55% (95% CI 49-61%). CONCLUSIONS: Even after standardised and thorough assessment, paediatricians may overlook impairments for cognitive, motor, and behavioural development. Long term follow up studies that do not include detailed standardised tests for multiple domains, especially fine motor domain, may underestimate developmental problems.
BACKGROUND: Long term follow up shows a high frequency of developmental disturbances in preterm survivors of neonatal intensive care formerly considered non-disabled. AIMS: To develop and validate an assessment tool that can help paediatricians to identify before 6 years of age which survivors have developmental disturbances that may interfere with normal education and normal life. METHODS: A total of 431 very premature infants, mean gestational age 30.2 weeks, mean birth weight 1276 g, were studied at age 5 years. Children with severe handicaps were excluded. The percentage of children with a correctly identified developmental disturbance in the domains cognition, speech and language development, neuromotor development, and behaviour were determined. RESULTS: The follow up instrument classified 67% as optimal and 33% as at risk or abnormal. Of the children classified as at risk or abnormal, 60% had not been identified at earlier follow up assessments. The combined set of standardised tests identified a further 30% with mild motor, cognitive, or behavioural disturbances. The paediatrician's assessment had a specificity of 88% (95% CI 83-93%), a sensitivity of 48% (95% CI 42-58%), a positive predictive value of 85% (95% CI 78-91%), and a negative predictive value of 55% (95% CI 49-61%). CONCLUSIONS: Even after standardised and thorough assessment, paediatricians may overlook impairments for cognitive, motor, and behavioural development. Long term follow up studies that do not include detailed standardised tests for multiple domains, especially fine motor domain, may underestimate developmental problems.
Authors: A G van Wassenaer; J H Kok; J J de Vijlder; J M Briët; B J Smit; P Tamminga; A van Baar; F W Dekker; T Vulsma Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-01-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M B Resnick; S V Gomatam; R L Carter; M Ariet; J Roth; K L Kilgore; R L Bucciarelli; C S Mahan; J S Curran; D V Eitzman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jun Cai; Chi Minh Tuong; Yiping Zhang; Christopher B Shields; Gang Guo; Hui Fu; David Gozal Journal: J Pathol Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: S A Reijneveld; M J K de Kleine; A L van Baar; L A A Kollée; C M Verhaak; F C Verhulst; S P Verloove-Vanhorick Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2006-07-28 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Frances M Cronin; Ricardo Segurado; Fionnuala M McAuliffe; Cecily C Kelleher; Richard E Tremblay Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Ellen A Fliers; Barbara Franke; Nanda N J Lambregts-Rommelse; Marieke E Altink; Cathelijne J M Buschgens; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Joseph A Sergeant; Stephen V Faraone; Jan K Buitelaar Journal: Child Adolesc Ment Health Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 2.175
Authors: Amanda L Smith; Michelle Alexander; James J Chrobak; Ted S Rosenkrantz; R Holly Fitch Journal: Dev Neurosci Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Boudien van Kessel-Feddema; Meta Sondaar; Martin de Kleine; Christianne Verhaak; Anneloes van Baar Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2006-11-16 Impact factor: 3.183