Literature DB >> 9685431

Educational disabilities of neonatal intensive care graduates.

M B Resnick1, S V Gomatam, R L Carter, M Ariet, J Roth, K L Kilgore, R L Bucciarelli, C S Mahan, J S Curran, D V Eitzman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between perinatal and sociodemographic factors in low birth weight and sick infants hospitalized at regional neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and subsequent educational disabilities.
METHOD: NICU graduates born between 1980 and 1987 at nine statewide regionalized level III centers were located in Florida elementary schools (kindergarten through third grade) during academic year 1992-1993 (n = 9943). Educational disability was operationalized as placement into eight mutually exclusive types of special education (SE) classifications determined by statewide standardized eligibility criteria: physically impaired, sensory impaired (SI), profoundly mentally handicapped, trainable mentally handicapped, educable mentally handicapped, specific learning disabilities, emotionally handicapped, and speech and language impaired (SLI). Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of placement in SE for selected perinatal and sociodemographic variables.
RESULTS: Placement into SE ranged from .8% for SI to 9.9% for SLI. Placement was related to four perinatal factors (birth weight, transport, medical conditions [congenital anomalies, seizures or intraventricular hemorrhage] and ventilation), and five sociodemographic factors (child's sex, mother's marital status, mother's race, mother's educational level, and family income). Perinatal factors primarily were associated with placement in physically impaired, SI, profoundly mentally handicapped, and trainable mentally handicapped. Perinatal and sociodemographic factors both were associated with placement in educable mentally handicapped and specific learning disabilities whereas sociodemographic factors primarily were associated with placement in emotionally handicapped and SLI.
CONCLUSIONS: Educational disabilities of NICU graduates are influenced differently by perinatal and sociodemographic variables. Researchers must take into account both sets of these variables to ascertain the long-term risk of educational disability for NICU graduates. Birth weight alone should not be used to assess NICU morbidity outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9685431     DOI: 10.1542/peds.102.2.308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  9 in total

1.  Behavioural and emotional problems in very preterm and very low birthweight infants at age 5 years.

Authors:  S A Reijneveld; M J K de Kleine; A L van Baar; L A A Kollée; C M Verhaak; F C Verhulst; S P Verloove-Vanhorick
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Maternal infection and white matter toxicity.

Authors:  G Jean Harry; Cindy Lawler; Susan H Brunssen
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Parent Experience of Neonatal Encephalopathy.

Authors:  Monica E Lemmon; Pamela K Donohue; Charlamaine Parkinson; Frances J Northington; Renee D Boss
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.987

4.  Predicting school readiness from neurodevelopmental assessments at age 2 years after respiratory distress syndrome in infants born preterm.

Authors:  Athena I Patrianakos-Hoobler; Michael E Msall; Dezheng Huo; Jeremy D Marks; Susan Plesha-Troyke; Michael D Schreiber
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 5.449

5.  Effects of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) at age 8 years: preliminary data.

Authors:  Gloria B McAnulty; Frank H Duffy; Samantha C Butler; Jane H Bernstein; David Zurakowski; Heidelise Als
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Development and evaluation of a follow up assessment of preterm infants at 5 years of age.

Authors:  M J K de Kleine; A L den Ouden; L A A Kollée; M W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; M Sondaar; B J M van Kessel-Feddema; S Knuijt; A L van Baar; A Ilsen; R Breur-Pieterse; J M Briët; R Brand; S P Verloove-Vanhorick
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Educational Disabilities Among Children Born With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

Authors:  Mary-Margaret A Fill; Angela M Miller; Rachel H Wilkinson; Michael D Warren; John R Dunn; William Schaffner; Timothy F Jones
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants.

Authors:  A Symington; J Pinelli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

9.  Gestational Age at Term and Educational Outcomes at Age Nine.

Authors:  Amanda Hedges; Hope Corman; Kelly Noonan; Nancy E Reichman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 9.703

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.