Literature DB >> 14499902

Hydration of krypton and consideration of clathrate models of hydrophobic effects from the perspective of quasi-chemical theory.

Henry S Ashbaugh1, D Asthagiri, Lawrence R Pratt, Susan B Rempe.   

Abstract

Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) results on a krypton-water liquid solution are presented and compared to recent XAFS results for the radial hydration structure for a Kr atom in liquid water solution. Though these AIMD calculations have important limitations of scale, the comparisons with the liquid solution results are satisfactory and significantly different from the radial distributions extracted from the data on the solid Kr/H(2)O clathrate hydrate phase. The calculations also produce the coordination number distribution that can be examined for metastable coordination structures suggesting possibilities for clathrate-like organization; none are seen in these results. Clathrate pictures of hydrophobic hydration are discussed, as is the quasi-chemical theory that should provide a basis for clathrate pictures. Outer shell contributions are discussed and estimated; they are positive and larger than the positive experimental hydration free energy of Kr(aq), implying that inner shell contributions must be negative and of comparable size. Clathrate-like inner shell hydration structures on a Kr atom solute are obtained for some, but not all, of the coordination number cases observed in the simulation. The structures found have a delicate stability. Inner shell coordination structures extracted from the simulation of the liquid, and then subjected to quantum chemical optimization, always decomposed. Interactions with the outer shell material are decisive in stabilizing coordination structures observed in liquid solution and in clathrate phases. The primitive quasi-chemical estimate that uses a dielectric model for the influence of the outer shell material on the inner shell equilibria gives a contribution to hydration free energy that is positive and larger than the experimental hydration free energy. The 'what are we to tell students' question about hydrophobic hydration, often answered with structural clathrate pictures, is then considered; we propose an alternative answer that is consistent with successful molecular theories of hydrophobic effects and based upon distinctive observable properties of liquid water. Considerations of parsimony, for instance Ockham's razor, then suggest that additional structural hypotheses in response to 'what are we to tell students' are not required at this stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14499902     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4622(03)00084-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys Chem        ISSN: 0301-4622            Impact factor:   2.352


  6 in total

1.  Structure and interactions in simple solutions.

Authors:  D T Bowron
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Observation of water dangling OH bonds around dissolved nonpolar groups.

Authors:  P N Perera; K R Fega; C Lawrence; E J Sundstrom; J Tomlinson-Phillips; Dor Ben-Amotz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Osmolyte trimethylamine-N-oxide does not affect the strength of hydrophobic interactions: origin of osmolyte compatibility.

Authors:  Manoj V Athawale; Jonathan S Dordick; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Importance of Hydrophilic Hydration and Intramolecular Interactions in the Thermodynamics of Helix-Coil Transition and Helix-Helix Assembly in a Deca-Alanine Peptide.

Authors:  Dheeraj S Tomar; Valéry Weber; B Montgomery Pettitt; D Asthagiri
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Reconciling the understanding of 'hydrophobicity' with physics-based models of proteins.

Authors:  Robert C Harris; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.333

Review 6.  Molecular Shape and the Hydrophobic Effect.

Authors:  Matthew B Hillyer; Bruce C Gibb
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 12.703

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.