Literature DB >> 14499431

What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?

M Soledad Cepeda1, Juan M Africano, Rodolfo Polo, Ramiro Alcala, Daniel B Carr.   

Abstract

Despite widespread use of the 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain intensity, relatively little is known about the meaning of decreases in pain intensity assessed by means of this scale to patients. We aimed to establish the meaning to patients of declines in pain intensity and percent pain reduction. Upon arrival to the postanesthesia care unit, postsurgical patients rated their baseline pain intensity on both a 0-10 NRS and on a 4-point verbal scale. Patients whose NRS was higher than 4/10 received intravenous opioids until their pain intensity declined to 4/10 or lower. During opioid titration, patients were asked every 10 min to rate pain intensity on a NRS and to indicate the degree of pain improvement on a 5-point Likert scale from 'no improvement' to 'complete pain relief'. Seven hundred adult patients were enrolled. For patients with moderate pain, a decrease of 1.3 units (20% reduction) corresponded to 'minimal' improvement, a decrease of 2.4 (35% reduction) to 'much' improvement, a decrease of 3.5 units (45% reduction) corresponded to 'very much' improvement. For patients with severe pain, the decrease in NRS pain score and the percentage of pain relief had to be larger to obtain similar degrees of pain relief. The change in pain intensity that is meaningful to patients increases as the severity of their baseline pain increases. The present findings are applicable in the clinical setting and research arena to assess treatment efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14499431     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00176-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  94 in total

1.  Course and prognosis of elbow complaints: a cohort study in general practice.

Authors:  S D M Bot; J M van der Waal; C B Terwee; D A W M van der Windt; L M Bouter; J Dekker
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Tramadol extended-release tablets in moderate to moderately severe chronic pain in adults: profile report.

Authors:  Philip I Hair; Monique P Curran; Susan J Keam
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Mesh fixation in open IPOM procedure with tackers or sutures? A randomized clinical trial with preliminary results.

Authors:  M R Langenbach; D Enz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous interscalene nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study.

Authors:  Linda T Le; Vanessa J Loland; Edward R Mariano; J C Gerancher; Anupama N Wadhwa; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 5.  Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas T Ventham; Ewan D Kennedy; Richard R Brady; Hugh M Paterson; Doug Speake; Irwin Foo; Kenneth C H Fearon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  [Prehospital analgesia performed by paramedics: quality in processes and effects under medical supervision].

Authors:  D Häske; B Schempf; G Gaier; C Niederberger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Nerve Blocks: Does Varying Local Anesthetic Delivery Method-Automatic Repeated Bolus Versus Continuous Basal Infusion-Influence the Extent of Sensation to Cold?: A Randomized, Triple-Masked, Crossover Study in Volunteers.

Authors:  Bahareh Khatibi; Engy T Said; Jacklynn F Sztain; Amanda M Monahan; Rodney A Gabriel; Timothy J Furnish; Johnathan T Tran; Michael C Donohue; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria Alba
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Out-of-pocket prices of opioid analgesics in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Scott A Strassels
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  [Prehospital analgesia by paramedics in Rhineland-Palatinate : Feasability, analgesic effectiveness and safety of intravenous paracetamol].

Authors:  T Luiz; G Scherer; A Wickenkamp; F Blaschke; W Hoffmann; M Schiffer; J Zimmer; S Schaefer; C Voigt
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.