T Luiz1,2, G Scherer3, A Wickenkamp4, F Blaschke5, W Hoffmann6, M Schiffer7, J Zimmer7, S Schaefer8, C Voigt8. 1. Deutsches Zentrum für Notfallmedizin & Informationstechnologie, Fraunhofer IESE, Fraunhofer-Platz 1, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland. thomas.luiz@iese.fraunhofer.de. 2. Klinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin 1, Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland. thomas.luiz@iese.fraunhofer.de. 3. Rettungsdienstbereiche Rheinhessen & Bad Kreuznach, Ingelheim am Rhein, Deutschland. 4. Deutsches Zentrum für Notfallmedizin & Informationstechnologie, Fraunhofer IESE, Fraunhofer-Platz 1, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland. 5. Rettungsdienstbereiche Ludwigshafen & Südpfalz, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland. 6. Rettungsdienstbereich Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland. 7. Rettungsdienstbereich Trier, Trier, Deutschland. 8. Rettungsdienstbereiche Koblenz & Montabaur, Koblenz, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In contrast to the widespread practice in life-threatening emergencies, delegation of medical pain therapy to paramedics by the medical director of Emergency Medical Services, EMS, are still the exception in Germany. This is due to the fact that in non-life-threatening situations, the expected benefit and potential side effects of drug therapy have to be carefully weighed. In addition, in Germany federal law generally restricts the administration of opiates to physicians. METHODS: In 2011 the medical directors of EMS in the German state of Rhineland- Palatinate (4 million inhabitants) developed and implemented a standard operating procedure (SOP) for paramedics related to the prehospital parenteral administration of paracetamol for patients with isolated limb trauma. After a 2 h training session and examination, paramedics were authorized to administer 1 g of paracetamol to patients with a pain score > 5 points on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). For purposes of quality management, every administration of paracetamol had to be prospectively documented on a specific electronic mission form. RESULTS: A total of 416 mission forms could be analyzed. After administration of paracetamol the median NRS score decreased from 8 points (interquartile range: 6; 8) to 4 points (interquartile range: 3; 7). In 51.2 % of the patients the pain intensity was reduced by at least 3 NRS points and in 50.5 % of the patients the NRS was less than 5 points after treatment. The extent of pain reduction was positively correlated with the initial NRS value (r = 0.31, p < 0.0001). No serious side effects were noted. The percentage of patients with an initial heart rate > 100/min declined from 14.6 % to 5.2 % after the administration of paracetamol (p < 0.0001), 18.7 % of the patients received paracetamol for trauma not related to the extremities and 7 % of the patients for nontraumatic pain. An emergency physician was involved in 50 % of the EMS missions and 98.6 % of the patients were transported to a hospital for further diagnostics and treatment. CONCLUSION: The prehospital intravenous administration of paracetamol by paramedics to patients with limb trauma is simple, safe and in 50 % of the patients effective in achieving a NRS value < 5; however, further improvements in prehospital pain therapy initiated by paramedics are desirable, especially in patients with an initial NRS value > 7.
BACKGROUND: In contrast to the widespread practice in life-threatening emergencies, delegation of medical pain therapy to paramedics by the medical director of Emergency Medical Services, EMS, are still the exception in Germany. This is due to the fact that in non-life-threatening situations, the expected benefit and potential side effects of drug therapy have to be carefully weighed. In addition, in Germany federal law generally restricts the administration of opiates to physicians. METHODS: In 2011 the medical directors of EMS in the German state of Rhineland- Palatinate (4 million inhabitants) developed and implemented a standard operating procedure (SOP) for paramedics related to the prehospital parenteral administration of paracetamol for patients with isolated limb trauma. After a 2 h training session and examination, paramedics were authorized to administer 1 g of paracetamol to patients with a pain score > 5 points on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). For purposes of quality management, every administration of paracetamol had to be prospectively documented on a specific electronic mission form. RESULTS: A total of 416 mission forms could be analyzed. After administration of paracetamol the median NRS score decreased from 8 points (interquartile range: 6; 8) to 4 points (interquartile range: 3; 7). In 51.2 % of the patients the pain intensity was reduced by at least 3 NRS points and in 50.5 % of the patients the NRS was less than 5 points after treatment. The extent of pain reduction was positively correlated with the initial NRS value (r = 0.31, p < 0.0001). No serious side effects were noted. The percentage of patients with an initial heart rate > 100/min declined from 14.6 % to 5.2 % after the administration of paracetamol (p < 0.0001), 18.7 % of the patients received paracetamol for trauma not related to the extremities and 7 % of the patients for nontraumatic pain. An emergency physician was involved in 50 % of the EMS missions and 98.6 % of the patients were transported to a hospital for further diagnostics and treatment. CONCLUSION: The prehospital intravenous administration of paracetamol by paramedics to patients with limb trauma is simple, safe and in 50 % of the patients effective in achieving a NRS value < 5; however, further improvements in prehospital pain therapy initiated by paramedics are desirable, especially in patients with an initial NRS value > 7.
Entities:
Keywords:
Emergency medical services; Paracetamol; Preclinical analgesia; Standard operating procedures; Trauma
Authors: Aikaterini Tzortzopoulou; Ewan D McNicol; M Soledad Cepeda; Marie Belle D Francia; Tamman Farhat; Roman Schumann Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-10-05
Authors: Sivera A A Berben; Hennie H L M Kemps; Pierre M van Grunsven; Joke A J Mintjes-de Groot; Robert T M van Dongen; Lisette Schoonhoven Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd Date: 2011
Authors: Marianne Gausche-Hill; Kathleen M Brown; Zoë J Oliver; Comilla Sasson; Peter S Dayan; Nicholas M Eschmann; Tasmeen S Weik; Benjamin J Lawner; Ritu Sahni; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Joseph L Wright; Knox Todd; Eddy S Lang Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: D Häske; B W Böttiger; B Bouillon; M Fischer; Gernot Gaier; B Gliwitzky; M Helm; P Hilbert-Carius; B Hossfeld; B Schempf; A Wafaisade; M Bernhard Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: David Häske; Bernd W Böttiger; Bertil Bouillon; Matthias Fischer; Gernot Gaier; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Matthias Helm; Peter Hilbert-Carius; Björn Hossfeld; Christoph Meisner; Benjamin Schempf; Arasch Wafaisade; Michael Bernhard Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Kristian D Friesgaard; Ingunn S Riddervold; Hans Kirkegaard; Erika F Christensen; Lone Nikolajsen Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Helmut Trimmel; Alexander Egger; Reinhard Doppler; Christoph Beywinkler; Wolfgang G Voelckel; Janett Kreutziger Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 1.041