Literature DB >> 28319550

Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Nerve Blocks: Does Varying Local Anesthetic Delivery Method-Automatic Repeated Bolus Versus Continuous Basal Infusion-Influence the Extent of Sensation to Cold?: A Randomized, Triple-Masked, Crossover Study in Volunteers.

Bahareh Khatibi1, Engy T Said, Jacklynn F Sztain, Amanda M Monahan, Rodney A Gabriel, Timothy J Furnish, Johnathan T Tran, Michael C Donohue, Brian M Ilfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown whether continuous or scheduled intermittent bolus local anesthetic administration is preferable for transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters. We therefore tested the hypothesis that when using TAP catheters, providing local anesthetic in repeated bolus doses increases the cephalad-caudad cutaneous effects compared with a basal-only infusion.
METHODS: Bilateral TAP catheters (posterior approach) were inserted in 24 healthy volunteers followed by ropivacaine 2 mg/mL administration for a total of 6 hours. The right side was randomly assigned to either a basal infusion (8 mL/h) or bolus doses (24 mL administered every 3 hours for a total of 2 bolus doses) in a double-masked manner. The left side received the alternate treatment. The primary end point was the extent of sensory deficit as measured by cool roller along the axillary line at hour 6 (6 hours after the local anesthetic administration was initiated). Secondary end points included the extent of sensory deficit as measured by cool roller and Von Frey filaments along the axillary line and along a transverse line at the level of the anterior superior iliac spine at hours 0 to 6.
RESULTS: Although there were statistically significant differences between treatments within the earlier part of the administration period, by hour 6 the difference in extent of sensory deficit to cold failed to reach statistical significance along the axillary line (mean = 0.9 cm; SD = 6.8; 95% confidence interval -2.0 to 3.8; P = .515) and transverse line (mean = 2.5 cm; SD = 10.1; 95% confidence interval -1.8 to 6.8; P = .244). Although the difference between treatments was statistically significant at various early time points for the horizontal, vertical, and estimated area measurements of both cold and mechanical pressure sensory deficits, no comparison remained statistically significant by hour 6.
CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found in this study involving healthy volunteers to support the hypothesis that changing the local anesthetic administration technique (continuous basal versus hourly bolus) when using ropivacaine 0.2% and TAP catheters at 8 mL/h and 24 mL every 3 hours significantly influences the cutaneous effects after 6 hours of administration. Additional research is required to determine whether changing variables (eg, local anesthetic concentration, basal infusion rate, bolus dose volume, and/or interval) would provide different results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319550      PMCID: PMC5362121          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  36 in total

1.  Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks: Does Varying Local Anesthetic Delivery Method (Automatic Repeated Bolus Doses Versus Continuous Basal Infusion) Influence Cutaneous Analgesia and Quadriceps Femoris Strength? A Randomized, Double-Masked, Controlled, Split-Body Volunteer Study.

Authors:  Amanda M Monahan; Jacklynn F Sztain; Bahareh Khatibi; Timothy J Furnish; Pia Jæger; Daniel I Sessler; Edward J Mascha; Jing You; Cindy H Wen; Ken A Nakanote; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  "Going fishing"--the practice of reporting secondary outcomes as separate studies.

Authors:  Edward R Mariano; Brian M Ilfeld; Joseph M Neal
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Continuous transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Zorica B Jankovic; Stephen G Pollard; Meyyappan M Nachiappan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Epidural infusions versus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block infusions: retrospective study.

Authors:  Vasanth Rao Kadam; John L Moran
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Cutaneous Sensory Block Area, Muscle-Relaxing Effect, and Block Duration of the Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: A Randomized, Blinded, and Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Kion Støving; Christian Rothe; Charlotte V Rosenstock; Eske K Aasvang; Lars H Lundstrøm; Kai H W Lange
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

6.  A randomized, triple-masked, active-controlled investigation of the relative effects of dose, concentration, and infusion rate for continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks in volunteers.

Authors:  S J Madison; A M Monahan; R R Agarwal; T J Furnish; E J Mascha; Z Xu; M C Donohue; A C Morgan; B M Ilfeld
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: description of anatomy and clinical technique.

Authors:  Peter D Hebbard; Michael J Barrington; Carolyn Vasey
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  The efficacy of automated intermittent boluses for continuous femoral nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison to continuous infusions.

Authors:  M Gabriel Hillegass; Larry C Field; Scott R Stewart; Jeffrey J Borckardt; Luke Dong; Peggy E Kotlowski; Harry A Demos; H Del Schutte; Scott T Reeves
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 9.452

10.  Bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with 24 hours ropivacaine infusion via TAP catheters: A randomized trial in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Pernille L Petersen; Karen L Hilsted; Jørgen B Dahl; Ole Mathiesen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.