Literature DB >> 1447653

Olfactory performance during childhood. I. Development of an odorant identification test for children.

R A Richman1, E M Post, P R Sheehe, H N Wright.   

Abstract

Because there has been no suitable diagnostic instrument for evaluation of olfaction in children, we designed an odorant identification test for that purpose. We screened 40 microencapsulated odorants ("scratch 'n' sniff" cards) by randomly grouping them into 40 overlapping sets of five odorants each. Forty-one children, 4 and 5 years of age, tried to identify each test odorant, selecting their responses from among five photographs depicting the substances in the set of odorants. We used the results to select a subset of five odorants (baby powder, bubble gum, candy cane, fish, and orange). To determine how well these odorants could be identified by normal children, we tested another 134 subjects, 3 1/2 to 13 years of age. For children 3 1/2 years to 5 years 4 months of age, the mean (+/- SEM) percentage of correct responses increased from 66% +/- 8% to 92% +/- 2%. Thereafter the mean percentage of correct responses remained at a plateau of about 90%. The 10th percentile for the percentage of correct responses tended to be higher for girls than for boys throughout childhood. We concluded that this set of five odorants can be correctly identified by most normal children 5 years of age or older. The performances of three older subjects with Kallmann syndrome were all subnormal, but the overall efficacy of the test for evaluating children with olfactory deficits needs to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1447653     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80337-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

1.  Correlation between olfactory bulb volume and olfactory function in children and adolescents.

Authors:  T Hummel; M Smitka; S Puschmann; J C Gerber; B Schaal; D Buschhüter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Olfactory deficits, cognition and negative symptoms in early onset psychosis.

Authors:  Cheryl Corcoran; Agnes Whitaker; Eliza Coleman; Jane Fried; Judith Feldman; Nora Goudsmit; Dolores Malaspina
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Olfactory testing in children using objective tools: comparison of Sniffin' Sticks and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT).

Authors:  Sarah C Hugh; Jennifer Siu; Thomas Hummel; Vito Forte; Paolo Campisi; Blake C Papsin; Evan J Propst
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Effects of diversity in olfactory environment on children's sense of smell.

Authors:  Lenka Martinec Nováková; Jitka Fialová; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of age and cognition on a cross-cultural paediatric adaptation of the Sniffin' Sticks Identification Test.

Authors:  Laís Orrico Donnabella Bastos; Marilisa Mantovani Guerreiro; Andrew John Lees; Thomas T Warner; Laura Silveira-Moriyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The influences of age on olfaction: a review.

Authors:  Richard L Doty; Vidyulata Kamath
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-07

7.  Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children - evaluation of a modified "Sniffin' Sticks" test.

Authors:  Janine Gellrich; Carolin Stetzler; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Thomas Hummel; Valentin A Schriever
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Olfactory perception in children.

Authors:  E Leslie Cameron
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.