Literature DB >> 1439325

An independent application accuracy evaluation of stereotactic frame systems.

R J Maciunas1, R L Galloway, J Latimer, C Cobb, E Zaccharias, A Moore, V R Mandava.   

Abstract

The purpose of incorporating stereotactic methodology into neurosurgical procedures is to consistently achieve a high degree of accuracy and precision in localizing intracranial targets. Therefore, the limits of resolution for the therapeutic intervention itself are a function of the accuracy and precision inherent to the particular stereotactic frame system itself. The total clinically relevant error (application accuracy) comprises errors associated with each procedural step, including imaging, target selection, vector calculation and the mechanical errors of stereotactic frames. To evaluate these parameters, a systematic error analysis was carried out in the 4 most commonly used CT-compatible stereotactic devices: the Brown-Roberts-Wells, Cosman-Roberts-Wells, Kelly-Goerss Compass (modified Todd-Wells) and Leksell frames. Over 7,681 independent test measurements were made. The results suggest a potentially significant degree of error in application accuracy of all stereotactic instrumentation which is accentuated by imaging-associated error. These individual error values must be considered with every clinical use of stereotactic frames.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1439325     DOI: 10.1159/000098981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  6 in total

1.  The evolution of stereotactic guidance in neuroendoscopy.

Authors:  Wuttipong Tirakotai; Oliver Bozinov; Ulrich Sure; Thomas Riegel; Helmut Bertalanffy; Dieter Hellwig
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors.

Authors:  Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Andreas Unterberg; Roland Metzner; Jens Dreyhaupt; Georg Eggers; Christian Rainer Wirtz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Quality and safety in stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy: can more be done?

Authors:  Timothy D Solberg; Paul M Medin
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2011

4.  The role of registration in accurate surgical guidance.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  Clinical testing of an alternate method of inserting bone-implanted fiducial markers.

Authors:  Ramya Balachandran; Mark A Fritz; Mary S Dietrich; Andrei Danilchenko; Jason E Mitchell; Veronica L Oldfield; Wendy W Lipscomb; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Joseph S Neimat; Peter E Konrad; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model.

Authors:  Andrea Spyrantis; Tirza Woebbecke; Daniel Rueß; Anne Constantinescu; Andreas Gierich; Klaus Luyken; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Eva Herrmann; Florian Gessler; Marcus Czabanka; Harald Treuer; Maximilian Ruge; Thomas M Freiman
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.493

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.