BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery utilizes image guidance via bone-implanted fiducial markers to achieve the desired submillimetric accuracy and to provide means for attaching microstereotactic frames. For maximal benefit, the markers must be inserted to the correct depth since over-insertion leads to stripping and under-insertion leads to instability. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to test clinically a depth-release drive system, the PosiSeat™, versus manual insertion (pilot hole followed by manual screwing until tactile determined correct seating) for implanting fiducial markers into the bone. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, the PosiSeat™ was used to implant markers in 15 DBS patients (57 fiducials). On post-insertion CT scans, the depth of the gap between the shoulder of the fiducial markers and the closest bone surface was measured. Similar depth measurements were performed on the CT scans of 64 DBS patients (250 fiducials), who underwent manual fiducial insertion. RESULTS: Median of shoulder-to-bone distance for PosiSeat™ and manual insertion group were 0.03 and 1.06 mm, respectively. Fifty percent of the fiducials had the shoulder-to-bone distances within 0.01-0.09 mm range for the PosiSeat group and 0.04-1.45 mm range for the manual insertion group. These differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A depth-release drive system achieves more consistent placement of bone-implanted fiducial markers than manual insertion.
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery utilizes image guidance via bone-implanted fiducial markers to achieve the desired submillimetric accuracy and to provide means for attaching microstereotactic frames. For maximal benefit, the markers must be inserted to the correct depth since over-insertion leads to stripping and under-insertion leads to instability. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to test clinically a depth-release drive system, the PosiSeat™, versus manual insertion (pilot hole followed by manual screwing until tactile determined correct seating) for implanting fiducial markers into the bone. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, the PosiSeat™ was used to implant markers in 15 DBS patients (57 fiducials). On post-insertion CT scans, the depth of the gap between the shoulder of the fiducial markers and the closest bone surface was measured. Similar depth measurements were performed on the CT scans of 64 DBS patients (250 fiducials), who underwent manual fiducial insertion. RESULTS: Median of shoulder-to-bone distance for PosiSeat™ and manual insertion group were 0.03 and 1.06 mm, respectively. Fifty percent of the fiducials had the shoulder-to-bone distances within 0.01-0.09 mm range for the PosiSeat group and 0.04-1.45 mm range for the manual insertion group. These differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A depth-release drive system achieves more consistent placement of bone-implanted fiducial markers than manual insertion.
Authors: T Z Aziz; D Nandi; S Parkin; X Liu; N Giladi; P Bain; R G Gregory; C Joint; R B Scott; J F Stein Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2001 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: R J Maciunas; R L Galloway; J Latimer; C Cobb; E Zaccharias; A Moore; V R Mandava Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 1992 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Peter E Konrad; Joseph S Neimat; Hong Yu; Chris C Kao; Michael S Remple; Pierre-François D'Haese; Benoit M Dawant Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Nicolas Gerber; Mauricio Reyes; Livia Barazzetti; Hans Martin Kjer; Sergio Vera; Martin Stauber; Pavel Mistrik; Mario Ceresa; Nerea Mangado; Wilhelm Wimmer; Thomas Stark; Rasmus R Paulsen; Stefan Weber; Marco Caversaccio; Miguel A González Ballester Journal: Sci Data Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 6.444