Literature DB >> 1439023

Radiation dose in CT.

L N Rothenberg1, K S Pentlow.   

Abstract

The energy deposited in the patient by the rotating x-ray beam in computed tomography produces more uniform absorbed dose values within the section of imaged tissue than those produced in conventional radiologic procedures. The dose values within a specific section are determined by factors such as voltage, current, scan time, scan field, rotation angle, filtration, collimation, and section thickness and spacing. For routine dose determinations, a pencil ionization chamber is usually employed with a plastic phantom. Dose for a specific patient can be determined with thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on the patient. Multiple-scan procedures normally increase the dose in a specific section by less than a factor of two. Typical multiple-scan average doses are in the range of 40-60 mGy for head scans and 10-40 mGy for body scans. Integral dose, however, is directly proportional to the number of sections in an examination. When examination factors are changed to reduce dose, the image noise increases. An optimum protocol is one that results in a balance between dose and image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1439023     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.12.6.1439023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  10 in total

1.  CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction.

Authors:  M Cohnen; H Fischer; J Hamacher; E Lins; R Kötter; U Mödder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Strategies of dose reduction.

Authors:  Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

3.  Effective doses to adult and pediatric patients.

Authors:  Walter Huda
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-06

4.  Image quality and dose in spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  F R Verdun; R A Meuli; F O Bochud; C Imsand; S Raimondi; P Schnyder; J F Valley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?

Authors:  Berhan Pirimoglu; Recep Sade; Hayri Ogul; Mecit Kantarci; Suat Eren; Akın Levent
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-10

6.  Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning.

Authors:  K D Hopper; J D Neuman; S H King; A R Kunselman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers.

Authors:  John Boice; Lawrence T Dauer; Kenneth R Kase; Fred A Mettler; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Comparison of different patient positioning strategies to minimize shoulder girdle artifacts in head and neck CT.

Authors:  Stefan Wirth; Thomas Meindl; Marcus Treitl; Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Feasibility of high-resolution, low-dose chest CT in evaluating the pediatric chest.

Authors:  M M Ambrosino; N B Genieser; K J Roche; A Kaul; R M Lawrence
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994

10.  Radiation dose reduction of chest CT with iterative reconstruction in image space - Part I: studies on image quality using dual source CT.

Authors:  Hye Jeon Hwang; Joon Beom Seo; Jin Seong Lee; Jae-Woo Song; Song Soo Kim; Hyun Joo Lee; Chae Hun Lim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.