Literature DB >> 1436429

Outcome measures for clinical trials involving traumatically brain-injured patients: report of a conference.

G L Clifton, R L Hayes, H S Levin, M E Michel, S C Choi.   

Abstract

A conference was held in Houston, Texas, on October 8-9, 1991, to develop recommendations for outcome measures for clinical trials in traumatic brain injury. Participants, all experts in this area, discussed and agreed on treatments for patients with severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS] < or = 8) and moderate brain injury (GCS, 9-12). A parallel trial design was recommended rather than a factorial, sequential, or crossover design. It was agreed that stratifying randomization based on motor score alone or on a combination of motor score and age would result in increased power. Acute stage measurements, such as cerebral blood flow, cerebrospinal fluid biochemistry, and evoked potentials, were recommended only when they satisfied a specific hypothesis. Functional outcome measures were recommended as the primary outcome measure for severe brain injury (GCS, 3-8). Either the Glasgow Outcome Scale or Disability Rating Scale, measured at 6 months after injury, were recommended as the primary outcome measure for severe brain injury (GCS, < or = 8). For patients with moderately severe brain injury (GCS, 9-12), the Disability Rating Scale at 3 months after injury was recommended as the primary outcome measure. The Neurobehavioral Rating Scale appears to be a satisfactory instrument for measuring behavioral changes. Specific neuropsychological measures were recommended as supplementary outcome measures for both severe and moderate brain injury, consistent with a 1.5-hour period available for testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1436429     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199211000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  15 in total

1.  The neurobehavioural rating scale-revised: sensitivity and validity in closed head injury assessment.

Authors:  S R McCauley; H S Levin; M Vanier; J M Mazaux; C Boake; P R Goldfader; D Rockers; M Butters; D A Kareken; J Lambert; G L Clifton
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Prospective comparison of acute confusion severity with duration of post-traumatic amnesia in predicting employment outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Risa Nakase-Richardson; Stuart A Yablon; Mark Sherer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Glasgow Outcome Scale Measures and Impact on Analysis and Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jose-Miguel Yamal; H Julia Hannay; Shankar Gopinath; Imoigele P Aisiku; Julia S Benoit; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the glasgow outcome scale.

Authors:  J T Wilson; L E Pettigrew; G M Teasdale
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Acute glucose and lactate metabolism are associated with cognitive recovery following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Christina Mannino; Thomas C Glenn; David A Hovda; Paul M Vespa; David L McArthur; John D Van Horn; Matthew J Wright
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Addressing the challenges of obtaining functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury research: missing data patterns, timing of follow-up, and three prognostic models.

Authors:  Leila R Zelnick; Laurie J Morrison; Sean M Devlin; Eileen M Bulger; Karen J Brasel; Kellie Sheehan; Joseph P Minei; Jeffrey D Kerby; Samuel A Tisherman; Sandro Rizoli; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Rardi van Heest; Craig D Newgard
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Neurological outcome scale for traumatic brain injury: III. Criterion-related validity and sensitivity to change in the NABIS hypothermia-II clinical trial.

Authors:  Stephen R McCauley; Elisabeth A Wilde; Paolo Moretti; Marianne C Macleod; Claudia Pedroza; Pamala Drever; Sierra Fourwinds; Melisa L Frisby; Sue R Beers; James N Scott; Jill V Hunter; Elfrides Traipe; Alex B Valadka; David O Okonkwo; David A Zygun; Ava M Puccio; Guy L Clifton
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Very Early Administration of Progesterone Does Not Improve Neuropsychological Outcomes in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Felicia C Goldstein; Angela F Caveney; Vicki S Hertzberg; Robert Silbergleit; Sharon D Yeatts; Yuko Y Palesch; Harvey S Levin; David W Wright
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  Developing a Cognition Endpoint for Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Noah D Silverberg; Paul K Crane; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; James Holdnack; Brian J Ivins; Rael T Lange; Geoffrey T Manley; Michael McCrea; Grant L Iverson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Early metabolic crisis-related brain atrophy and cognition in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Matthew J Wright; David L McArthur; Jeffry R Alger; Jack Van Horn; Andrei Irimia; Maria Filippou; Thomas C Glenn; David A Hovda; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.978

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.