Literature DB >> 23617608

Neurological outcome scale for traumatic brain injury: III. Criterion-related validity and sensitivity to change in the NABIS hypothermia-II clinical trial.

Stephen R McCauley1, Elisabeth A Wilde, Paolo Moretti, Marianne C Macleod, Claudia Pedroza, Pamala Drever, Sierra Fourwinds, Melisa L Frisby, Sue R Beers, James N Scott, Jill V Hunter, Elfrides Traipe, Alex B Valadka, David O Okonkwo, David A Zygun, Ava M Puccio, Guy L Clifton.   

Abstract

The neurological outcome scale for traumatic brain injury (NOS-TBI) is a measure assessing neurological functioning in patients with TBI. We hypothesized that the NOS-TBI would exhibit adequate concurrent and predictive validity and demonstrate more sensitivity to change, compared with other well-established outcome measures. We analyzed data from the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia-II clinical trial. Participants were 16-45 years of age with severe TBI assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury. For analysis of criterion-related validity (concurrent and predictive), Spearman's rank-order correlations were calculated between the NOS-TBI and the glasgow outcome scale (GOS), GOS-extended (GOS-E), disability rating scale (DRS), and neurobehavioral rating scale-revised (NRS-R). Concurrent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations between the NOS-TBI and GOS, GOS-E, DRS, and NRS-R measured contemporaneously at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury (all p<0.0013). For prediction analyses, the multiplicity-adjusted p value using the false discovery rate was <0.015. The 1-month NOS-TBI score was a significant predictor of outcome in the GOS, GOS-E, and DRS at 3 and 6 months postinjury (all p<0.015). The 3-month NOS-TBI significantly predicted GOS, GOS-E, DRS, and NRS-R outcomes at 6 and 12 months postinjury (all p<0.0015). Sensitivity to change was analyzed using Wilcoxon's signed rank-sum test of subsamples demonstrating no change in the GOS or GOS-E between 3 and 6 months. The NOS-TBI demonstrated higher sensitivity to change, compared with the GOS (p<0.038) and GOS-E (p<0.016). In summary, the NOS-TBI demonstrated adequate concurrent and predictive validity as well as sensitivity to change, compared with gold-standard outcome measures. The NOS-TBI may enhance prediction of outcome in clinical practice and measurement of outcome in TBI research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617608      PMCID: PMC3751279          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.2925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  23 in total

1.  The neurobehavioural rating scale-revised: sensitivity and validity in closed head injury assessment.

Authors:  S R McCauley; H S Levin; M Vanier; J M Mazaux; C Boake; P R Goldfader; D Rockers; M Butters; D A Kareken; J Lambert; G L Clifton
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Use of the Disability Rating Scale Recovery curve as a predictor of psychosocial outcome following closed-head injury.

Authors:  S R McCauley; H J Hannay; P R Swank
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.

Authors:  K M Hall; T Bushnik; B Lakisic-Kazazic; J Wright; A Cantagallo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury.

Authors:  W D Gouvier; P D Blanton; K K LaPorte; C Nepomuceno
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale.

Authors:  G Teasdale; B Jennett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale: comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury.

Authors:  K Hall; D N Cope; M Rappaport
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage.

Authors:  B Jennett; M Bond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community.

Authors:  M Rappaport; K M Hall; K Hopkins; T Belleza; D N Cope
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician.

Authors:  H S Levin; W M High; K E Goethe; R A Sisson; J E Overall; H M Rhoades; H M Eisenberg; Z Kalisky; H E Gary
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Authors:  B Jennett; J Snoek; M R Bond; N Brooks
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Non-pharmaceutical therapies for stroke: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Fan Chen; Zhifeng Qi; Yuming Luo; Taylor Hinchliffe; Guanghong Ding; Ying Xia; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  The rich get richer: brain injury elicits hyperconnectivity in core subnetworks.

Authors:  Frank G Hillary; Sarah M Rajtmajer; Cristina A Roman; John D Medaglia; Julia E Slocomb-Dluzen; Vincent D Calhoun; David C Good; Glenn R Wylie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers Are Associated With Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and αII-spectrin Breakdown Products in Brain Tissues Following Penetrating Ballistic-Like Brain Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Kristen E DeDominicis; Hye Hwang; Casandra M Cartagena; Deborah A Shear; Angela M Boutté
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Worse Than Death: Survey of Public Perceptions of Disability Outcomes After Hypothetical Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jo Ellen Wilson; Myrick C Shinall; Taylor C Leath; Li Wang; Frank E Harrell; Laura D Wilson; Mina F Nordness; Shayan Rakhit; Michael R de Riesthal; Melissa C Duff; Pratik P Pandharipande; Mayur B Patel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Disability Rating Scale in the First Few Weeks After a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury as a Predictor of 6-Month Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Jose-Miguel Yamal; Imoigele P Aisiku; H Julia Hannay; Frances A Brito; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Spectrum of outcomes following traumatic brain injury-relationship between functional impairment and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Anastasia Tsyben; Mathew Guilfoyle; Ivan Timofeev; Fahim Anwar; Judith Allanson; Joanne Outtrim; David Menon; Peter Hutchinson; Adel Helmy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.216

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.