Literature DB >> 143527

Effects of fusimotor stimulation on the response of the secondary ending of the muscle spindle to sinusoidal stretching.

P D Cussons, M Hulliger, P B Matthews.   

Abstract

1. The responsiveness of the spindle secondary ending to sinusoidal stretching has been studied using the soleus muscle of the anaesthetized cat. The sensitivity (impulses/sec firing per mm stretching) and the phase of the response were determined by computer averaging. The small linear range was studied at frequencies of 0.5-500 Hz, and also the larger non-linear range at 1 Hz.2. In the linear range, stimulation of single fusimotor fibres (which were presumed to be static axons) approximately halved the sensitivity of the ending to low frequency stretching (up to 30 Hz), but did not produce any change in the phase of the response. Thus, from the point of view of motor function, fusimotor activity provides control of gain and a biasing signal, but not control of the relative sensitivity of the secondary ending to length and velocity.3. In contrast, such stimulation slightly increased the responsiveness of the secondary ending to high-frequency stretching (100-500 Hz) and slightly advanced the phase of the response above that of the passive ending.4. The results are discussed in relation to the effect of static fusimotor stimulation on the primary ending, and to findings on secondary endings in the decerebrate cat.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 143527      PMCID: PMC1353547          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  17 in total

1.  The effects of fusimotor stimulation during small amplitude stretching on the frequency-response of the primary ending of the mammalian muscle spindle.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; M Hulliger; P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  THE EFFECTS OF STIMULATION OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FUSIMOTOR FIBRES ON THE RESPONSE TO STRETCHING OF THE PRIMARY ENDINGS OF MUSCLE SPINDLES.

Authors:  A CROWE; P B MATTHEWS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  THE RESPONSE OF DE-EFFERENTED MUSCLE SPINDLE RECEPTORS TO STRETCHING AT DIFFERENT VELOCITIES.

Authors:  P B MATTHEWS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Effects of combining static and dynamic fusimotor stimulation on the response of the muscle spindle primary ending to sinusoidal stretching.

Authors:  M Hulliger; P B Matthews; J Noth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  On the subdivision of static and dynamic fusimotor actions on the primary ending of the cat muscle spindle.

Authors:  F Emonet-Dénand; Y Laporte; P B Matthews; J Petit
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Static and dynamic fusimotor action on the response of Ia fibres to low frequency sinusoidal stretching of widely ranging amplitude.

Authors:  M Hulliger; P B Matthews; J Noth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Effects of fusimotor stimulation on the sensitivity of the muscle spindle secondary ending to small amplitude sinusoidal stretch [proceedings].

Authors:  P D Cussons; M Hulliger; P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length.

Authors:  P B Matthews; R B Stein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Static fusimotor fibres and the position sensitivity of muscle spindle receptors.

Authors:  M C Brown; D G Lawrence; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Action of static and dynamic fusimotor fibres on secondary endings of cat's spindles.

Authors:  B Appelberg; P Bessou; Y Laporte
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  10 in total

1.  Static gamma-motoneurones couple group Ia and II afferents of single muscle spindles in anaesthetised and decerebrate cats.

Authors:  M H Gladden; H Matsuzaki
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Discharges in human muscle spindle afferents during a key-pressing task.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Information transmission by isolated frog muscle spindle.

Authors:  R Eckhorn; H Querfurth
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Properties of cat neck muscle spindles and their excitation by succinylcholine.

Authors:  R F Price; M B Dutia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Synchronous afferent discharge from a passive muscle of the cat: significance for interpreting spike-triggered averages.

Authors:  T M Hamm; R M Reinking; D D Roscoe; D G Stuart
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  A model of the motor servo: incorporating nonlinear spindle receptor and muscle mechanical properties.

Authors:  C C Gielen; J C Houk
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Coding of pulsatile motor output by human muscle afferents during slow finger movements.

Authors:  J Wessberg; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  An analysis of receptor potential and tension of isolated cat muscle spindles in response to sinusoidal stretch.

Authors:  C C Hunt; R S Wilkinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Response of human muscle spindle afferents to sinusoidal stretching with a wide range of amplitudes.

Authors:  N Kakuda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.