Literature DB >> 141497

Static and dynamic fusimotor action on the response of Ia fibres to low frequency sinusoidal stretching of widely ranging amplitude.

M Hulliger, P B Matthews, J Noth.   

Abstract

1. Single fusimotor fibres were stimulated repetitively to test their action on the responsiveness of muscle spindle primary endings in the cat soleus to sinusoidal stretching of both large and small amplitude. Frequencies of 0.06-4 Hz were used at amplitudes from 10 mum to 3 mm.2. The response was assessed by fitting a sinusoid to the cycle histogram of the afferent firing throughout the course of the cycle; this linear approximation measures the fundamental of the response and ignores any harmonics. The sine was allowed to project to negative values and any empty bins in the histogram were ignored when fitting.3. With small amplitudes of stretching the histograms were reasonably sinusoidal, but with large amplitudes they showed appreciable distortion of the wave form for the passive ending and during dynamic fusimotor stimulation. Non-linearity of response manifested itself also, with increasing amplitude of stretching, by an increase in the phase advance of the response, by increasing r.m.s. deviation of the histogram points from the fitted sine and (for dynamic stimulation) by an increase in the mean value of the fitted sine.4. With increasing amplitude the response modulation ceased to increase proportionately with the stimulus, so that the sensitivity of the ending to a large stretch (defined as afferent modulation/stretch amplitude) was appreciably less than for a small stretch. This effect was most pronounced for the passive ending.5. Whatever the amplitude of movement the modulation during static stimulation was less than that for the passive or during dynamic stimulation. For small amplitudes the response during dynamic stimulation was less than that of the passive, but for large amplitudes the response during dynamic stimulation was always the greater. At some intermediate cross-over amplitude the two responses were the same size, though still differing slightly in other respects. The value of the cross-over amplitude was usually about 200 mum at 1 Hz, and increased on lowering the frequency. Thus dynamic fusimotor action does not uniformly produce either an increase or a decrease in the sensitivity of the ending in relation to the passive.6. Bode plots, for each amplitude, of sensitivity and phase against frequency suggested that(a) under all conditions the ending is relatively insensitive to frequency in the range studied, for the slope of the log-log sensitivity lines was only 0.15-0.2 (3.5-6 db/decade);(b) the mechanism which makes for non-linearity is not particularly frequency sensitive;(c) static fusimotor stimulation does not change the frequency sensitivity of the ending;(d) dynamic fusimotor stimulation very slightly increases the frequency sensitivity of the ending for large amplitudes.In reaching these conclusions more attention was paid to the slope of the sensitivity lines than to the values of phase.7. It appears that the major effect of fusimotor action, whether static or dynamic, is to regulate the sensitivity of the primary ending to stretching for all amplitudes of movement (i.e. gain) rather than to control the relative values of its sensitivity to length and to velocity (i.e. crudely, the damping in a feed-back loop).

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 141497      PMCID: PMC1283641          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  19 in total

1.  Analysis of response properties of deefferented mammalian spindle receptors based on frequency response.

Authors:  Z Hasan; J C Houk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The effects of fusimotor stimulation during small amplitude stretching on the frequency-response of the primary ending of the mammalian muscle spindle.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; M Hulliger; P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Transition in sensitivity of spindle receptors that occurs when muscle is stretched more than a fraction of a millimeter.

Authors:  Z Hasan; J C Houk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stretch-evoked potentiation of responses of muscle spindles in the cat.

Authors:  U Proske
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-05-02       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Component mechanisms of sensitivity and adaptation in an insect mechanoreceptor.

Authors:  D W Mann; K M Chapman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-10-31       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  FURTHER STUDIES OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FUSIMOTOR FIBRES.

Authors:  A CROWE; P B MATTHEWS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  THE EFFECTS OF STIMULATION OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FUSIMOTOR FIBRES ON THE RESPONSE TO STRETCHING OF THE PRIMARY ENDINGS OF MUSCLE SPINDLES.

Authors:  A CROWE; P B MATTHEWS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Effects of combining static and dynamic fusimotor stimulation on the response of the muscle spindle primary ending to sinusoidal stretching.

Authors:  M Hulliger; P B Matthews; J Noth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The response of spindle primary afferents to 1 Hz sinusoidal stretching during paired fusimotor stimulation [proceedings].

Authors:  M Hulliger; P B Matthews; J Noth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The response of fast and slow nuclear bag fibres and nuclear chain fibres in isolated cat muscle spindles to fusimotor stimulation, and the effect of intrafusal contraction on the sensory endings.

Authors:  I A Boyd
Journal:  Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci       Date:  1976-07
View more
  46 in total

1.  Modulation of primary afferent discharge by dynamic and static gamma motor axons in cat muscle spindles in relation to the intrafusal fibre types activated.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Increased muscle spindle sensitivity to movement during reinforcement manoeuvres in relaxed human subjects.

Authors:  E Ribot-Ciscar; C Rossi-Durand; J P Roll
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Selective processing of vestibular reafference during self-generated head motion.

Authors:  J E Roy; K E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The responses of primary spindle afferents to fusimotor stimulation at constant and abruptly changing rates.

Authors:  M Hulliger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Effects of combining static and dynamic fusimotor stimulation on the response of the muscle spindle primary ending to sinusoidal stretching.

Authors:  M Hulliger; P B Matthews; J Noth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Effects of fusimotor stimulation on the response of the secondary ending of the muscle spindle to sinusoidal stretching.

Authors:  P D Cussons; M Hulliger; P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Some observations on the efferent innervation of rat soleus muscle spindles.

Authors:  B L Andrew; G C Leslie; N J Part
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Responses of muscle spindles in feline dorsal neck muscles to electrical stimulation of the cervical sympathetic nerve.

Authors:  F Hellström; S Roatta; J Thunberg; M Passatore; M Djupsjöbacka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The dependence of the response of cat spindle Ia afferents to sinusoidal stretch on the velocity of concomitant movement.

Authors:  T K Baumann; M Hulliger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Detection of slow movements imposed at the elbow during active flexion in man.

Authors:  J L Taylor; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.