Literature DB >> 13891032

Producing either positive or negative tendencies to a stimulus associated with shock.

W O EVANS.   

Abstract

A technique is described in which rats are pretrained with reinforcement to bar press. Each bar press was associated with a tone. This tone was later paired with one of two aspects of an electric shock, either at the onset or at the end of the shock, in a situation in which the shock is inescapable. These animals were retested in the operant situation under conditions of extinction, but with tone present as a conditioned reinforcer. The finding was that animals for which the tone was associated with shock onset extinguished quickly, whereas animals for which the tone was paired with shock termination extinguished more slowly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LEARNING/experimental

Mesh:

Year:  1962        PMID: 13891032      PMCID: PMC1404088          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  On secondary reinforcement and shock termination.

Authors:  R C BECK
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Relative resistance to reserpine of responses based on positive, as compared with negative, reinforcement.

Authors:  B M WENZEL
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-12

3.  The effects of various punishment-escape events upon subsequent choice behavior of rats.

Authors:  G N BUCHANAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1958-06

4.  The effect of sodium amytal on an approach-avoidance conflict in cats.

Authors:  C J BAILEY; N E MILLER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1952-06
  4 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  CONDITIONED PUNISHMENT.

Authors:  D F HAKE; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The relative aversiveness of signalled versus unsignalled shock-punishment.

Authors:  L Macdonald
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.