Literature DB >> 1421415

Optimization of busulfan dosage in children undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a pharmacokinetic study of dose escalation.

A M Yeager1, J E Wagner, M L Graham, R J Jones, G W Santos, L B Grochow.   

Abstract

Busulfan (BU) is a widely used myeloablative and antineoplastic agent in clinical bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The lower incidence of BU-associated toxicities and lower therapeutic effectiveness in young children given BU doses based on body weight (ie, 16 mg/kg) is associated with altered pharmacokinetics of BU; the area under the curve (AUC) of BU concentration versus time is significantly less in these patients than those observed in older children and adults. To optimize BU dosage in young BMT recipients, we developed a dosage regimen based on body surface area (BSA) and determined BU pharmacokinetics and BU-associated toxicities. Seven children (median age, 3.9 years, range, 1.1 to 5.7) undergoing allogeneic or autologous BMT for leukemia received 40 mg/m2/dose BU every 6 hours for 16 doses; BU concentrations were measured in the plasma, and AUCs were determined for each patient after the first and 13th doses. Expressed as a function of body weight, the median BU dosage was 26.4 mg/kg (range, 24.3 to 28.2), a 60% increase over the BU dosage based on body weight. Four patients developed mucositis, and one of them also developed nonfatal hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). No patients receiving 40 mg/m2 BU developed neurotoxicity (eg, seizures) or interstitial pneumonitis. Prompt and sustained engraftment was observed in the allogeneic BMT recipients, and late graft failure was not seen. The mean BU AUCs were 1,105 mumol/L.min (range, 790 to 2,080) after the first dose and 1,022 mumol/L.min (range, 632 to 1,860) after the 13th dose of BU, comparable to the AUCs in adults given 16 mg/kg of BU. These studies suggest that, in young children, BSA-based dosing of BU (40 mg/m2) provides drug exposures (AUCs) closer to adult values with acceptable toxicities and may improve therapeutic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1421415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Tacrolimus-related encephalopathy following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children.

Authors:  Takahisa Kanekiyo; Junichi Hara; Yoshiko Matsuda-Hashii; Hiroyuki Fujisaki; Sadao Tokimasa; Akihisa Sawada; Keiko Kubota; Kuriko Shimono; Katsumi Imai; Keiichi Ozono
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Efficacy and toxicity of radiation in preparative regimens for pediatric stem cell transplantation. II: Deleterious consequences.

Authors:  T D Miale; S Sirithorn; S Ahmed
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Plasma concentration monitoring of busulfan: does it improve clinical outcome?

Authors:  J S McCune; J P Gibbs; J T Slattery
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Delayed, transient encephalopathy after marrow transplantation: case reports and MRI findings in four patients.

Authors:  H I Tahsildar; B F Remler; R J Creger; B W Cooper; S M Snodgrass; R W Tarr; H M Lazarus
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Busulfan disposition and hepatic veno-occlusive disease in children undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  G Vassal; S Koscielny; D Challine; D Valteau-Couanet; I Boland; A Deroussent; J Lemerle; A Gouyette; O Hartmann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Oral chemotherapy agents in the treatment of leukaemia.

Authors:  R B Geller; S P Dix
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation; an alliance study (CALGB 10503, 19808, and 100103).

Authors:  Jan H Beumer; Kouros Owzar; Lionel D Lewis; Chen Jiang; Julianne L Holleran; Susan M Christner; William Blum; Steven Devine; Jonathan E Kolitz; Charles Linker; Ravi Vij; Edwin P Alyea; Richard A Larson; Mark J Ratain; Merrill J Egorin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Busulfan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Stefan O Ciurea; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.