Literature DB >> 1416159

A randomized, double-blind comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for postthoracotomy pain relief. Analgesic, pharmacokinetic, and respiratory effects.

A N Sandler1, D Stringer, L Panos, N Badner, M Friedlander, G Koren, J Katz, J Klein.   

Abstract

Although epidural opioids frequently are used to provide postoperative analgesia, several articles have suggested that the analgesia after epidural fentanyl is similar to that after an equal dose of fentanyl given intravenously. To address this issue further, 29 postthoracotomy patients were studied in a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing a lumbar epidural fentanyl infusion with an intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia, plasma fentanyl pharmacokinetics, and respiratory effects for 20 h postoperatively. In all patients in both groups, good analgesia was achieved (pain score less than 3, maximum 10) over a similar time course, although the patients receiving epidural infusion required a significantly larger fentanyl infusion dose than did the patients receiving intravenous infusion (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.95 +/- 0.45 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.56 +/- 0.36 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.0002). The time course for the plasma fentanyl concentrations was similar in the two groups, and plasma fentanyl concentrations were not significantly different at any sampling period (T7-T20; group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.8 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.6 +/- 0.6 ng/ml; P = 0.06). Similarly, calculated clearance values for the two groups were not significantly different (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 0.95 +/- 0.26 l.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 0.87 +/- 0.25 l.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.3). Both groups demonstrated a similar degree of mild to moderate respiratory depression postoperatively, which was assessed with continuous respiratory inductance plethysmography and sequential arterial blood gas analysis. Side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were mild and did not differ between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1416159     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199210000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  12 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block provides comparable analgesia and fewer episodes of hypotension than continuous epidural block after lung surgery.

Authors:  Hanae Okajima; Osamu Tanaka; Masahiro Ushio; Yasuko Higuchi; Yukiko Nagai; Katsuhiro Iijima; Yoshio Horikawa; Kazuko Ijichi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  The evolving role of spinal agents in acute pain.

Authors:  James W Heitz; Eugene R Viscusi
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-02

Review 3.  Use of nerve block techniques for postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Per H Rosenberg
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. An update.

Authors:  J Scholz; M Steinfath; M Schulz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Epidural opioids for post-thoracotomy pain.

Authors:  R P Grant
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Analgesic effects of thoracic epidural bupivacaine and fentanyl.

Authors:  E T Hudes; G M Hirano; B A Kashin; K Ho; I A MacDonald; K Shine
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Pharmacokinetics and transplacental distribution of fentanyl in epidural anesthesia for normal pregnant women.

Authors:  Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés; Luciana de Barros Duarte; Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli; Vera Lúcia Lanchote; Geraldo Duarte; Sérgio Pereira da Cunha
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  A comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for post-thoracotomy analgesia.

Authors:  A D Baxter; S Laganière; B Samson; J Stewart; K Hull; L Goernert
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Bupivacaine 0.125% improves continuous postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery.

Authors:  N H Badner; R Bhandari; W E Komar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 10.  Adverse effects of opioid agonists and agonist-antagonists in anaesthesia.

Authors:  T A Bowdle
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.