Literature DB >> 1832716

The dependence of the response of cat spindle Ia afferents to sinusoidal stretch on the velocity of concomitant movement.

T K Baumann1, M Hulliger.   

Abstract

1. The responses of de-efferented soleus muscle spindle primary afferents to 1 Hz sinusoidal stretches, which were superimposed on triangular background movements of intermediate amplitude (1.2 mm, half peak-to-peak) and widely varying speed, were recorded in anaesthetized cats. 2. Compared with control responses to the same sinusoids applied at fixed mean muscle length, the sensitivity to small (50 and 100 microns, half peak-to-peak), but not to large (1000 microns), sinusoidal movements was dramatically reduced during concomitant stretching, unless the background movements were extremely slow (well below 0.005 resting lengths per second). 3. For small stretches (50 and 100 microns) the reduction of sensitivity caused by background movement depended on the speed of this movement. For the highest velocity studied (1.6 mm s-1, corresponding to about 0.03 resting lengths per second) sensitivity dropped to below 10% of the control values. 4. The functional implication is that the sensitivity of spindle Ia afferents to small irregularities of voluntary movements (of any but the slowest speeds) may well be very much lower than it has hitherto been inferred from the striking sensitivity to minute disturbances at fixed mean muscle length. The present finding clearly puts extra demands on the gain of any spinal or central reflex actions of the sensory feedback from spindle afferents. 5. The effect is interpreted in terms of the widely accepted cross-bridge hypothesis of spindle small-movement sensitivity. The result suggests that in de-efferented intrafusal muscle fibres, which are subjected to imposed stretches, connected cross-bridges (conveying a friction-like property to the contractile fibre poles) may exist not only in a state of permanent attachment, but also in a dynamic equilibrium between stretch-induced detachment and reattachment. Indirect evidence further suggests that the duration of this disruption and reattachment cycle is of the order of 1 s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1832716      PMCID: PMC1180111          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  29 in total

1.  'Fusimotor set': new evidence for alpha-independent control of gamma-motoneurones during movement in the awake cat.

Authors:  A Prochazka; M Hulliger; P Zangger; K Appenteng
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Effects of stretch on dynamic fusimotor after-effects in cat muscle spindles.

Authors:  F Emonet-Dénand; C C Hunt; Y Laporte
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Fusimotor after-effects on responses of primary endings to test dynamic stimuli in cat muscle spindles.

Authors:  F Emonet-Dénand; C C Hunt; Y Laporte
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  After-effects of fusimotor stimulation on spindle la afferents' dynamic sensitivity, revealed during slow movements.

Authors:  T K Baumann; F Emonet-Dénand; M Hulliger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-01-28       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  [Modifications in the time course of the responses of spindle primary endings to small periodic changes in length produced by a slow muscle stretch].

Authors:  F Emonet-Dénand; Y Laporte; A Tristant
Journal:  C R Seances Acad Sci D       Date:  1980-09-22

6.  An analysis of receptor potential and tension of isolated cat muscle spindles in response to sinusoidal stretch.

Authors:  C C Hunt; R S Wilkinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Effects of slow muscle stretch on the responses of primary and secondary endings to small amplitude periodic stretches in de-efferented soleus muscle spindles.

Authors:  F Emonet-Dénand; Y Laporte; A Tristant
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-06-09       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Muscle spindle function during normal movement.

Authors:  A Prochazka
Journal:  Int Rev Physiol       Date:  1981

Review 9.  Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control.

Authors:  M Hulliger
Journal:  Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.545

View more
  3 in total

1.  Discharges in human muscle spindle afferents during a key-pressing task.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Discharge of human muscle spindle afferents innervating ankle dorsiflexors during target isometric contractions.

Authors:  L R Wilson; S C Gandevia; D Burke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Coding of pulsatile motor output by human muscle afferents during slow finger movements.

Authors:  J Wessberg; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.