Literature DB >> 1405547

The development and cross-validation of a self-report inventory to assess pure-tone threshold hearing sensitivity.

S Coren1, A R Hakstian.   

Abstract

Previous attempts to assess hearing loss by means of self-report survey items have shown only low to moderate correlations with actual audiometric measures, probably because these attempts used items with high face validity rather than laboratory-tested validity. Beginning with a pool of 108 items used with 384 individuals, we developed a self-report inventory (see Appendix) suitable for group testing or survey administration, which appears to have high correlation with pure-tone hearing thresholds. The inventory was then cross-validated against laboratory audiometric measures in a separate sample of 422 subjects. The resulting 12-item Hearing Screening Inventory (HSI) was shown to be reliable with an internal consistency coefficient (alpha) of 0.89 and test-retest stability coefficient of 0.88. The correlation between pure-tone hearing thresholds in the better ear and the HSI scores for the combined samples was r = 0.81. The correct classification rate for the HSI was 92.1% for a low fence of 25-dB hearing level and 93.4% for a high fence of 55-dB hearing level. A conversion equation with estimated variability is also provided for point estimates of pure-tone hearing thresholds from the HSI scores. A copy of the inventory and scoring procedure is appended to this report.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1405547     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3504.921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  14 in total

1.  Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation and Risk of Incident Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shruti Gupta; Sharon G Curhan; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Randomization test for coupled data.

Authors:  B D Zumbo
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

3.  Body mass index, waist circumference, physical activity, and risk of hearing loss in women.

Authors:  Sharon G Curhan; Roland Eavey; Molin Wang; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests.

Authors:  G A Flamme
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

5.  Analgesic use and the risk of hearing loss in women.

Authors:  Sharon G Curhan; Josef Shargorodsky; Roland Eavey; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Prospective study of alcohol consumption and self-reported hearing loss in women.

Authors:  Sharon G Curhan; Roland Eavey; Molin Wang; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Monitoring cognitive functioning: psychometric properties of the brief test of adult cognition by telephone.

Authors:  Margie E Lachman; Stefan Agrigoroaei; Patricia A Tun; Suzanne L Weaver
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2013-12-09

8.  Information loss over time defines the memory defect of propofol: a comparative response with thiopental and dexmedetomidine.

Authors:  Robert A Veselis; Ruth A Reinsel; Vladimir A Feshchenko; Ray Johnson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Visual analog scale in hearing loss.

Authors:  Samril Bokari; N Prepageran; R Raman
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-06-04

10.  Low-dose propofol-induced amnesia is not due to a failure of encoding: left inferior prefrontal cortex is still active.

Authors:  Robert A Veselis; Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Meghana Mehta; Hong Pan; Ray Johnson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.